• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For a while, long before Teslas were around, my wife went through a phase where she didn’t want a car with electronic door locks, “in case we crash into a retention pond.”

    So it came time for a new car, and while I’m talking with the sales people about price and such, all she wants to know is if she can get it without electronic locks. It seemed like she’d pay double if it didn’t have the e-locks.

    Finally I said, “I’ve never gone into a retention pond, and I don’t know anyone who has ever gone into a retention pond. It seems like the real solution to the retention pond problem isn’t skipping electronic door locks, it’s STAYING OUT OF RETENTION PONDS! Let’s try that solution first. if you go into a retention pond, then we’ll discuss getting rid of e-locks.”

    It’s been about 30 years, and I still don’t know anyone whose gone into a retention pond, including my wife. But she still mentions the lock thing whenever we get a new car.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 minutes ago

      It seems like the real solution to the retention pond problem isn’t skipping electronic door locks, it’s STAYING OUT OF RETENTION PONDS

      The premise of this logic is wholesale problematic.

      You can use the same logic and say:

      The real solution to seat belts is to just not wreck your car

      The real solution to stair rails is to just not fall down stairs

      The real solution to fire alarms is to just not light your building on fire

      …etc

      Same reasoning/logical framework applied to different problem areas.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Out of 350 million people? I’ll take my chances.

        And I keep a window breaking tool in the door for just such an occasion.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          Thats completely reasonable, but be aware that most cars made in the past decade have laminated side windows where a tool like that probably won’t work.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    about 70 models currently on US roads sporting electric handles

    So you can be mad at Tesla for making this popular but it’s clearly not a Tesla specific problem anymore.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Its like manufacturers thought, “let’s take these incredibly dangerous machines and make them less reliable.”

      I honestly dont get it.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, they said “let’s take these incredibly dangerous machines and make them MORE PROFITABLE”

        Follow the money. It’s ALWAYS follow the money.

        Look at it that way, and you’ll get it.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That was in the works, and then Trump let him DOGE every investigation into his behavior. That’s obstruction, and when we take back power, he should be charged with that, and everything else he’s guilty of. Then give him a trillion dollar fine, and life in prison.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Recently there was a similar incident in China involving a Xiaomi car. This led to an incoming legislation that will require all cars to have mechanical handles in case of emergency.

    Tesla alone had many such cases and there are no plans whatsoever to do anything about it.

    Imagine losing to China in safety regulations.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Sure, we’ve got fail-safes, but they don’t work. They make the customer FEEL better though, and isn’t that worth the higher price?

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        My brother’s Tesla has a manual latch you can pull, but it is not marked, and “concealed” by the door handle. I kept using it by accident which kinda pissed him off, because the door is designed to roll down the window about a half inch before opening to avoid damaging the window seal. Using the manual override skips this rolldown, and just bends the seal out of the way when you open the door.

        Personally, I like the interior handles on the Mustang Mach E better. There is one latch to open the door, but it has two stages. First stage triggers the electric “door kicker” and the second stage physically pulls the latch open. So in an emergency, you just pull the same door handle harder to force it open.

        • 31ank@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My Mazda MX-5 also rolls down the windows when opening the door, but its still a physical latch in the end so it’s possible to design it this way (there’s even a warning in the manual that the window could shatter if no battery is installed)

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’m not saying it’s impossible. I’m just sharing my experience with how Tesla implemented it.

            • 31ank@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Didn’t want to sound mean or anything, just wanted to add my experience 😅

        • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Didn’t know that about the E’s doors. That sounds so much better and safer. Muscle memory is almost all you have when you have been knocked out on impact and have no idea what is happening after a wreck.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Thats because america only does what makes the most money, cause money will solve all the problems surely. China makes policy decisions on what’s best for the citizens of the country.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        We’ve been fed a lot of information over the years that isn’t strictly accurate. While their government is demonstrably overbearing, they have prioritized a substantial technical renaissance. I’m sure there is still some pretty crazy stuff going on since you can get a full meal in a noodle shop for the equivalent of a couple bucks, but they’re really advancing quickly in many sectors.

      • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There are tons of valid criticisms of China but they seem to have their shit firmly together in many areas.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I wouldn’t go that far… They are really all over the place

          But at least they don’t allow companies to get powerful enough to control the government. If there’s one lesson to learn, it’s how important it is to keep capital in line

          • pilferjinx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That is one good thing about state capitalism. Although, it does nothing to prevent party corruption, which has definitely been getting worse for them.

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    When I was young and naïve in my 50s, I thought US cars had safety requirements, and the era of rolling death traps had been beaten back by Ralph Nader. Must’ve been my mistake. Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shut it libtard, “safety” is a made-up democrat hoax. Don’t wear your seatbelt, die like a real man.

      I feel it is probably necessary to add /s

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My grandfather 40 years ago rolled his Bronco II into a ditch while drinking and driving. I honestly believe he’d lived if he wore his seat belt. The accident ejected him and broke his neck…ending his life.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

      Really? Are you actually surprised? The man who decided to put electric un-openable doors onto is the same man who took a chainsaw to the federal regulatory budget and got rid of any agency that had the the authority to rule on such an issue.

      To repeat:

      Is there nobody in the government looking at safety issues like un-openable doors?

      Nope, Elon Musk fired the people who were responsible for making his cars safe because Elon thought their recommendations cost too much and your safety is a sacrifice Elon Musk is willing to make if it makes Tesla stock value increase.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      For real. Mechanical handle hidden under the rubber cupholder is wild. As a European I’m amazed that it’s legal.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t see how prospective car buyers can see shit like that and not see it as indicative of much larger design issues lurking under the hood.

        Like, how do you see that and not immediately question the safety concerns of adding additional steps to escape the vehicle if there is an accident and the electric door loses power? How do you from there not question what other poor design decisions may have been made if something so obvious got through? Do people just not think about the things they’re spending 10s of thousands of dollars on?

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          A lot of prospective car buyers like the thing based on the few details they interact with during a test drive and don’t think any further ahead, just like with everything else in their lives.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think that most people just don’t think about such details. Personally I wouldn’t. I’d think about the ergonomics of the unlock mechanism when it works as intended, which sucks, by the way.

          But I wouldn’t really think about safety. It’s not my job. I would assume the industrial designer did their job, and that the regulator did theirs.

      • lemming741@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I hate that others have jumped on the door handle trends. It’s like apple being “brave enough” to remove the headphone port. My car at least has the electric switch and mechanical backup on the same handle. I don’t love it, but you can’t get trapped inside.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Someone else posted a photo. It appears to be an obvious lever, not hidden under the cupholder.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is regulation. Tesla is just the first company to make a separate emergency handle. Other companies managed to figure out how to do it with one handle. Even with frameless doors.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Corvettes, going back to at least the C6 generation (2005ish) have electronic handles, but they have mechanical emergency pulls on the floor next to the door sill. Yes, messing with them will set off the car alarm if the doors are locked. Ask me how I know.

        I have no idea why anyone where it freezes would want electronic handles, especially ones that electronically self-present. I’ve had to yeet my frozen shit door open on more than occasion.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “It’s terrifying,” said Kevin Clouse, a Georgia resident who was trapped in his Model 3 following a 2023 crash and had to kick out a window to escape. He recently filed a complaintwith US regulators and has sought to raise awareness of door-related entrapment on social media. “You’re in a box that’s on fire and you can’t get out.”

    What a horrifying way to go.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      trapped in his Model 3

      If it was his model 3 then that implies he was driving. Did he try the mechanical door release and it didn’t work or did he not know about it because Tesla stupidly made it invisible?

        • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They’re more/less in the place you would expect them to be but they’re blended in with the rest of the door. You have to pull up on the thing in front of the window button.

            • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 day ago

              Only in the front, unfortunately. Somehow there are way too many Tesla owners who don’t know about them. The back seat is another story. There IS a mechanical release under the rubber liner in the door pocket. You have to pull the liner out and pull on a steel cable to open it. Some people have cut holed in the liner and added little handles to get around this put it’s still a huge oversight by Tesla IMO.

            • socsa@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Yes, and they are so conspicuous, about 90% of passengers use them instead of the button until briefed otherwise.

            • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              In that case that’s uh actually pretty obvious.

              Really? Because I have 15 people who burned to death because it isn’t.

              That’s not where people look for door handles. It’s not marked. It doesn’t stand out in any way. It’s obvious only if you already know it’s there. Otherwise it’s a death trap.

            • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              I thought so too. Slightly less obvious for the driver side. See my other comment about the back seat though.

                • greybeard@feddit.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  On that side it isn’t obvious at all. It blend in with the window buttons and looks like it is just a plastic panel. A design flourish or convenience, not a functional lever.

                • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Yeah… Some people really are not observant and car manufacturers need to cater to those people as well.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can someone explain what was wrong with normal door handles that they would do this?

    Is it like some Steve Jobs-esque obsession with a car not being a car or something?

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      They think the extra .01 “mpg” gained from smooth doors is worth the risk. I think most people would agree that it’s not.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s actually dumber. I’m pretty sure this just got removed because mechanical door handles don’t look or sound as cool as electronic door handles.

        One must remember that Elon Musk is perpetually trapped at 11 years old.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not necessary to have electric door handles for that. Aircraft have been using purely mechanical handles where one side is pushed to make the other stand out enough to pull for decades. Several flush door handle designs requiring no electronics have appeared on cars as well.

    • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As another commenter pointed out it does have a noticeable impact on mpg, however you can still do flush mounted handles that are fully manual. Basically every other car manufacturer does manual locks except for Tesla and a couple small (less than 10,000 units annually) companies. The thing is electric locks are cheaper, and when you don’t care about safety, you go for the cheapest option.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The real issue is that they can’t be opened from the inside. Unless you locate the mechanical latch, which involves peeling off the rubber lining of the cupholder.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      My understanding is that it’s related to the frameless glass on the doors, it needs to roll the windows down a smidgen to clear the water seal on the door frame, so you press the button which tells the computer to roll the window down a couple of mm then actuate the door.

      • cmfhsu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Every coupe has had this feature for 40 years, before they had electric windows, even. You just dip the window as the door latch actuates, whether the window is electrically or mechanically hooked to the door handle.

        I have one of those cars in my garage with a fully mechanical door handle, with a mechanical lock for the key and everything.

  • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have similar style of handles on my car that the model 3, S, and Y have. The thing is the manufacturer made the handle manual while still being flush with the body, they even added a physical key hole so I can have access to the interior if the battery is dead, while still being flush with the body. It’s not hard to do manual, it’s safer, it just costs slightly more, and as we’ve seen in capitalism, lives are cheap. So what if it kills someone, you saved $5.

    • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is there some evidence that the electric handles are cheaper? You still need all of the same mechanical latches and linkages, but now add electric actuators and wiring. Intuitively it doesn’t seem like it would be cheaper to me.

      • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Electric door handles don’t need all the linkages, it’s literally a solenoid that’s attached directly to the latch and that solenoid is both the door latch and the door lock. There’s only 2 moving parts, the solenoid and the latch itself. The model 3, S, X and Y have an additional moving part that is the actual handle that triggers the solenoid, but the cybertruck doesn’t even have that.

        My manual door handle has the outside handle, the lock, the inside handle, the electronic lock, the linkages between the lock and the outside handle, the linkages between the lock and the inside handle, the linkages between the lock and the latch, then the latch. There’s way more machining and assembly involved in a manual lock and door handle than an electronic lock, and that machining has to be way more precise.

        • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s valid. I guess that by “so the mechanical linkages” etc. I was thinking of what actually holds the door shut securely in the vehicle frame. You still need a mechanical override for the solenoid actuator, but I can see that being cheaper overall after reading your description.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, because nothing matters except stock price.

      Musk’s companies aren’t evaluated based on their ability to sell products/services, they’re valued on hype.

      If he left any of his companies they would suffer drastic stock crashes which would likely kill the company.

      Oddly enough Silicon Valley does a really good job of explaining how wonky the math gets.

      “Normal” companies try to raise stock by making a product, these tech companies are basically exploiting glitch’s in the stock market. It’s why everyone else is losing.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are layers to this.

    No exterior door handles is a massive danger in the event of a crash that incapacitates those inside. No interoir door handles is a massive danger to those inside in the event of a crash that takes out the electrical system.

    That said. Plenty of crashes will “disable” the doors just from the type of impact and so forth. And those tend to be the really bad ones.

    Which is why EVERYONE should have, preferably a pair, of those car window breakers. Keep one handy to the driver and one either in the box between the driver and passenger or somewhere very visible in the back seat area.

    In the event of a really bad crash? That is how you cut your seatbelt if it is jammed or you are otherwise unable to easily access it. And that is how you smash the glass to get out. And if you pull up to the side of an accident? That is how you get the injured driver out (keeping in mind all safety related concerns with moving someone who might have a spinal injury).

    Just… also be aware that it has become increasingly popular (and not just among swasticars) to laminate many of the occupant windows. This DOES prevent shards of glass from flying into your face in the event a pickup truck tried to run you over. This ALSO makes escape a LOT harder. It is good to actually read your manual (or at least the labels on the windows) to know which ones you can escape from in the event of a crash.

    But yeah., There is no fucking reason to remove mechanical door handles. But it is not THAT much of a danger in the event of a crash. Whereas it IS very much a deeply annoying hazard in the event of accidentally starting a firmware update with the door closed…

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      15 deaths directly as a result of doors failing to unlock, not because the door was smashed but because of electronic failure, is not THAT much of a danger?

      Some of these incidents aren’t even crashes. It’s just battery malfunction, causing a fire and trapping the passengers.

      And for nothing. Teslas do have a mechanical emergency release latch. It’s just hidden.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        People vastly underestimate the importance of having a window breaking tool. Many people who die when they go into a lake could very much be alive if they had just unbuckled, smashed, and swam/floated away. One of the best Mythbusters episodes was about specifically this. Opening a door when you are underwater but there is still air in the cabin is REALLY REALLY hard and the vast majority of people do not have the training/calm to take a last gasp of air, wait for pressure to equalize, and get going.

        Same with burning vehicles. People very much underestimate how rapidly it is just not possible for all but the most adrenaline filled of mothers to get into that car to pull out someone who is unconscious or panicking because they can’t get their seatbelt off.

        People who can’t get out of a burning vehicle because the electrical system has failed catastrophically but there is no meaningful damage to the doors is not nothing. But… 15 people IS nothing. Especially when you realize they might fall under a different category as well.

        As per https://www.nfpa.org/education-and-research/research/nfpa-research/fire-statistical-reports/vehicle-fires the NFPA estimated an annual of 215k vehicle fires in the US during the 2018-2022 timeframe with 643 deaths per year (I think. Kinda ambiguous). Assuming those deaths were within a single calendar year (too lazy to find an archive link or see if reader mode works), that is 2%. If it is spread out, that is even less.

        The swasticar doors are fundamentally stupid and dangerous and have no reason to exist. But in terms of ways to prevent loss of life? They are REALLY low on the totem pole.

        Whereas normalizing both drivers and good samaritans having tools to actually get into a car goes a long way. Because maybe that fire is because of the battery and the entire car is intact otherwise. More often you rae dealing with a jammed door because they got t-boned or rolled in a bad way. And the answer in both cases is to smashy-smashy.


        A good way to think of it (that will remind us this is still essentially reddit and people hate metaphors) is like if Toyota decided every single car needed a dorsal fin… made out of sharpened steel. Yes, someone would inevitably get killed by it and that would lead to statistics. But it would have no meaningful impact on the lethality of a vehicle because so much else about cars is already so insanely dangerous.

        But also… why the fuck would you duct tape a sword to a car? Don’t fucking do that.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Alright, you’ve convinced me that a window breaking tool in the glove box might not be the worst idea. Got any recommendations for good ones or is this just a generic item?

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Check wirecutter or even amazon. Tempered glass is actually ridiculously easy to break even with just a spark plug in your hand, so anything with a hammer shape and the right tip is gonna do it. Just make sure there is also a seatbelt cutter on the tool.

            That said, it is probably worth spending some more money to get the spring loaded type. It doesn’t take THAT much effort to smash a tempered glass window, but it is a lot easier to just push a device against it instead.

    • Albbi@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yikes! I better buy a bigger vehicle so that if I’m in a crash, I won’t be the one getting crushed! /s

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve encountered electronic door poppers on a few rental cars and I’ve always disliked them. I see no advantage at all, and several more things to go wrong.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, like I’ve seen mechanical door handles break but it’s always been on really old vehicles (except one that was a POS chevy aveo someone I knew had). Electronic shit just introduces problems and doesn’t add anything.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I’ve broken and repaired a couple. They’re easy to diagnose, and the parts are cheap. Perhaps more importantly for safety, their failure modes are not triggered by crashing.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I passionately hate the door handles on Teslas they are too perfect of a symbol of useless empty technological development that Tesla embodies. I can’t swallow the firehose of poetic synchronicity it is too intense for me to be in close proximity to, my bitter sarcasm starts going haywire like a geiger counter near radioactive waste. Tesla door handles are affront to basic engineering principles and it terrifies me that the same guy who demanded them is allowed to own a company that sends humans to space.