• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would be more excited about JPEG XL if it was backward compatible. Not looking forward to yet another image standard that requires OS and hardware upgrades simply so servers can save a few bytes.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      What does backward compability in image format even means? Being able to open it in windows image viewer?

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      It requires neither of those upgrades though? Unless you’re still using Windows XP I guess for some reason. It’s just an update to the image decoder