• ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    As a anti religious person this meme ignores the reality of science to present its “ideal” while not extending the same to religion.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except it doesn’t. Science is all about asking questions, religion is about accepting answers.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the ideal the commentor is talking about, this isn’t reality. A significant number of peer reviewed papers are being published without replicable results or any hint of a falsifiable hypothesis.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          No one is arguing that every scientist is ethical.

          The issue is at its core one is about questioning and one isn’t. That fundamental doesn’t change.

        • rmuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          And how do you know this? Is it because someone said “this is true” and then someone else was then able to say “no it isn’t - and here’s the evidence”.

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well, that’s kinda my point, a lot of modern theoretical physics doesn’t present a falsifiable hypothesis - it can’t be tested, there’s no proposal for how it could ever be tested.

            In terms of evidence the unrepeatable results - some of it is being repeated and checked, a lot of it isnt. Predictions of how bad the problem is is derived statistically. So much so it’s considered a crisis in modern science.