Having fucked up social discourse with Twitter and then Bluesky, Jack Dorsey claims he has seen the error of his ways, and definitely won’t do it a third time with his new nonprofit aimed at helping developers build and deploy (OSS or commercial) social media tech built on the Nostr platform (with AI!). Yeesh, I might be biased. Maybe I shouldn’t be writing these summaries.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    If only someone could invent a distributed open source social media platform, wouldn’t that be great. Then he could spend his time and energy doing something more productive.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 天前

      Nostr really isn’t about the platform, it’s about the simple, platform-agnostic keypair setup that identifies you.

    • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      There was Secure Scuttblebutt, but it had issues that hindered adoption.

      Nostr does actually seem like a more usable version of it, but the only people I’ve ever seen use it are cryptobros, so it’s got a kind of anti-network effect.

      Edit: Honestly a “SSB2” running over something like Veilid could be real nice, but it’s still early days.

  • ileftreddit@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 天前

    At a certain point, people stop telling you “no” and then you end up with a gold nose ring and hippie beard. Dorsey probably hasn’t heard a “no” since 2006

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 天前

      Why is he so hated here? Twitter model is one thing that is kinda fit for global-open-decentralized approaches without much difference for the user. I could never use it, but plenty of people do and seem to have a feeling of hivemind over it.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 天前

        Because the tech he makes is inherently terrible and despite being used in a positive way it is still centralized and ripe for misuse by people like Musk. On top of that the long term feasibility is based on advertising potential to get the funding.

        He says positive stuff most of the time but his actions are the opposite. Blusky is supposed to be decentralized, but the structure as it exists requires it to actually be centralized when implemented. Plus his most recent ‘secure’ thing wasn’t even tested for security issues because he is a hype man who constantly lies.

      • ag10n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 天前

        Figure head syndrome. Literally a man with money, otherwise completely unremarkable

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 天前

    Like it or not, Nostr is the only one that doesn’t tie my identity to a server. I’ve lost several Lemmy accounts during the Reddit migration and I’ve had to subscribe to new instances all over again. Once it’s down, really hard to migrate anything

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 天前

      This is the advantage of decentralization over federation. IMHO the fact that Lemmy is only federated really hurts it. Not so much for user accounts (in theory these can be backed up restored and moved. Not ideal but not awful) but in that communities are tied to servers. When the server a community is on goes away it is hugely damaging to that community.

      • dil@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 天前

        lemm.ee leaving made me not want to use this as much and I had 6 different accounts, it was just the main

    • Saiwal@utsukta.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 天前

      Hubzilla has successfully implemented portable identities for a number of years and i am surprised how its unheard of. Coupled with magic sign-on it has some of the craziest features that are much needed in the broader fediverse.

      • dil@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        how is it compared to friendica, can you make dislikes not anonymous there too? that was the funniest feature

        • Saiwal@utsukta.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 天前

          hubzilla is a fork of friendica, yes hubzilla shows all likes and dislikes and the names :D

      • notarobot@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        Can you link me to the feature? Or at least tell me the name so that I can look it up?

        • Saiwal@utsukta.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 天前

          Here are two resources that document these features:

          1. Nomadic Identity: Nomadic identity means true ownership of online identity. With Hubzilla, you don’t have an account on a server, you own an identity that you can take with you across the grid. You can clone a channel across multiple hubs for resilience against network failures or censorship, or you can completely move a channel from one hub to another, taking your data and connections with you.
            https://hubzilla.org/help/member/clone
          2. Magic Sign-on https://magicsignon.org/rmagic
            • Saiwal@utsukta.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 天前

              the hubzilla network and some other projects have this implemented and it works nicely, a person on hub1 can simply visit hub2 and interact (like comment etc.) since hub2 authenticates user with hub1 using this protocol. I am not a developer of this but it has been tested and used since a number of years.

              • notarobot@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 天前

                I get that part. That sounds a of like the fediverse. But that cloning feature looks like you clone everything you do between many instances which is awesome, but I’m not sure how they could clone like counts. AFAIK they would either have to instruct the likers client to go like on the other instances, or trust the number reported by the OP

                • Saiwal@utsukta.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 天前

                  If someone likes my comment then my account relays that activity to the clones to keep them in sync.

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 天前

    I feel like nonprofit should come with default quotations nowadays. At this point it’s just a way to avoid taxation during development until you have a feasible route to profitability.

  • triptrapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 天前

    Looks like he and Zuck have the same stylist. Anyone know what this look is called, with the oversized tee and chain around his neck?

  • Philamand@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 天前

    Thank you for the article, it was an interesting read. I don’t think he’ll make anything better than Mastodon or even Bluesky so I won’t try Nostr, but I’ll keep an eye on it. It may be interesting to follow.

    • majster@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 天前

      It’s so “decentralized” that political activists from authoritarian countries get deplatformed on request of the government.

    • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 天前

      He doesn’t like it because it’s the same as twitter according to him.

      Journalists don’t like it because they get called out on bullshit there.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 天前

    I’m not sure he’s the one who fucked it up.

    140 symbols and the whole atmosphere I don’t like, but I have my own fair set of disorders.

    Hashtags are honestly a good idea, just like a social system organized around them.

    Except I probably would prefer that to be similar to modernized Usenet. Actually going to pressure my family members to install Briar, want to start using it, and apparently it has such a functionality. Not sure yet. Anyway, the framework under it (right now Briar itself is the only application, but authors have ambitions) definitely would support such a thing. Maybe I’ll finally have an incentive to learn Android development.

    • artifex@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 天前

      I kinda agree Twitter was born of a more innocent age, and he was just a tech kid with a good enough pitch to get Silicon Valley VC. The problem is that he did little to rein in powers that were purposely using the platform for social manipulation. Then – when he already knew better – he went and started Bluesky, which he specifically said was going to counteract all of Twitter’s deficiencies, but capitalism got the better of him, so to make the platform attractive to VCs, advertisers, whatever, his team started to ditch what made Bluesky unique in favor of business tools to help it make money. Business is gonna business, it’s not 100% his fault, but I can’t imagine what will change a 3rd time around.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 天前

        Well, that Bitchat thing of his may (after, eh, fixing a lot of it) turn to be not so bad.

        Though I went to the Briar site, and apparently it’s not just Briar, but also a framework for virtually everything communications-wise offline-enabled.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 天前

        I dunno, Java to native code compilers exist. Maybe one can compile Bramble into that with some interface wrapper, and then use it under iOS, but I don’t know what the hell I’m talking about.

    • artifex@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 天前

      I think the main one is that Nostr is supposed to be really simple, and derive some security/privacy from that simplicity. Whereas ATProto and ActivityPub store and forward content so that each rely has a copy, on Nostr nodes the messages are all ephemeral. So it has something of a following with crypto bros and privacy enthusiasts. With nostr IDs are also based on public/private keys unlike ATProto/ActivityPub that use a username@instancename scheme, so signing and identifying content that belongs to a user is easier and more guaranteed to be correct, and your username isn’t tied to any specific server “instance”