Chess “is diverse and inclusive,” the German Chess Federation said in rejecting calls for a ban on trans competitors.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I have, and never will, understand how the fuck being trans gives you any sort of advantage in chess. Only thing I have ever rationalized about this is that the people saying it surely must be sexist cave people.

  • Green_Mouse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

    An unfair competition… in a damn chess game?! WHAT?!

  • Commiunism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Chess “is diverse and inclusive,” the German Chess Federation said

    Lol, lmao even. It’s one of the more sexist sports there are in terms of organization, often marginalizing women and most of these marginalizing structures are still there to this day. This isn’t to excuse anti-LGBT rhetoric, but pretending like everything is fine with chess probably doesn’t help.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why should it prompt backlash? Did they celebrate the win by knocking over their opponent’s king with their cock?

    These pearl clutchers make me want to force said pearls down their throat until they shit out every single bead or I can grab one end of the necklace and rip it out like a fucking BeyBlade!

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There are open tournaments and women’s tournaments. The open tournaments are for anyone. Women have competed in them but at the top level it is somewhat rare.

      The women’s tournaments are intended to provide an environment that encourages more women to play chess. There’s considerable sexism among men (not only in the chess world, hah) which is not always very welcoming.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because back in the day when blatant sexism was the norm, women were excluded. Women-only tournaments were an attempt to correct that.

      In a perfect world, everybody would play in the same tournaments and all genders would feel equally welcome to them, but that’s not the world we live in.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Times reports that she claimed some cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

    At least with the more physical sports there’s a (spurious) argument about bone structure or whatever. There really isn’t that same argument wrt Chess, even if it be a bit physically taxing.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s the excuse here? “Afab players are too stupid to face trans opponents”?

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    Internationally, the World Chess Federation imposed a temporary ban in 2023, preventing trans women from women’s tournaments pending further review — a rule Germany opposes, pointing out that a trans woman had already claimed a national women’s title in the early 2000s, Apollo News reports.

    I think this just completely took effect and was not temporary.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_people_in_chess
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/67127168

    The whole thing is a shitshow, because if you are MTF , FIDE does not think you are a woman, thus can’t have women’s titles, but also, if you’re FTM , you are ALSO not a woman, so you can’t keep your women’s titles (Womens’ grandmaster, Womens’ International Master,etc).

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The German Chess Federation has rejected any ban

    meh.

    if they really cared, there would not be any official ‘gendered’ tournaments. but there are, because they want that for some reason.

    • AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Gendered chess tournaments make a certain amount of sense. The main issues are that women are less likely to play chess due to societal and cultural factors and without their own division would have even more societal and cultural roadblocks to joining the game. This isn’t touching on how getting certain titles requires winning specific events that would prove even more difficult for those same reasons.

      Basically without gendered tournaments there would be even less women in chess and it would be even more of a “boys club” than it already is.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also why the anti-trans argument makes absolutely no sense in chess. Like, in sports there’s some room for nuance because cis men do have a huge advantage in most sports of cis women, and depending on the sport and the stage of transition, that can carry forward to trans women. It’s fucking hard to have that nuanced conversation because 95% of the time it gets drowned out by transphobes, but there’s still something to talk about.

        But in chess? Nobody is arguing there’s any inherent biological advantage. The only reason for gendered tournaments is to create a safer space for non-men to compete in a male-dominated pastime. The only argument for excluding trans women from the Women’s category in chess is transphobia. It’s a real “mask off” moment for all the TERFs claiming it’s about “integrity in sport” (Jesus fuck, writing that out made me realise how similar this all is to gamergate and the birth of the alt right).

        A lot of tournaments in HEMA (historical European martial arts—think fencing, but with bigger, older styles of swords than what they use at the Olympics) around where I lived have started using an “Underrepresented Genders” (URG) category alongside the Open category, instead of Women’s. It’s functionally not much different from having a Women’s category that also accepts trans people (important possible difference: it accepts trans men as well as trans women, and enbies), but the name helps make it clearer. I quite like that as a concept.

          • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 day ago

            How does a trans-woman’s socialization compromise competitive integrity? That’s an entirely internal problem, and it doesn’t affect any other competitors. This is really just grabbing for any excuse to be transphobic.

              • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, it isn’t. It’s so women can enter the game without the pressure of going into a tournament setting mostly dominated by men. A trans-woman being in the women’s tournament does not compromise that unless you don’t think trans-woman are women. Being born male does not impact one’s ability to compete in chess, just the accessibility of a competition dominated men. If you’re already in the women’s space, then that issue is entirely moot. A trans-woman faces the same social barrier to competing, and is entitled to the same protected space.

                The only argument against that is if you don’t really think trans-woman are women.

                • verdigris@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I don’t agree that that is the motivation. You’re confusing cause and effect. The competition space is dominated by men because of social and cultural norms, which is why they made a women’s division. It’s not so there’s “less pressure”, it’s so the entire top level of the competition isn’t entirely men and there’s actually a meaningful competition for both groups.

              • Gwen@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                Are tomboys allowed to play chess? Do I have to wear a skirt and be straight? My psychologist told me I was socialized as a girl, but does that make me eligible to play chess? I have normal thoughts and reactions for a woman and men intimidate me more than you will ever know. Can I please play now? Ugh, you know what, this women’s league stuff is a another example of men making up rules for me again. Count me out.

            • verdigris@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I hypothetically agree, but note that you’re basically arguing for trans women to compete with men. Just in this scenario bio women also have to. And classically this results in men dominating and women being discouraged from even joining due to factors discussed above.

      • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, easy fix there right? Just have a women’s tournament and an everybody tournament. Women can then choose which to enter.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The system only functions the way it does because the people prop it up. Any system.

        • AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          So instead of having a welcoming space for a historically and actively marginalized group while allowing them to still complete in every other tournament we should just what? Close women’s divisions, revoke all their titles, and tell them to play “real chess” instead?

          Like getting rid of women’s tournaments is only a bad thing that would make the game stagnant even further to being the “boys club” game a lot of people already think it is when chess should be for everybody.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m not fond of self-marginalizing. So maybe some of us are uncomfortable. Some men will be, too. Maybe individuals are capable of self-regulating if empowered to do that. I’m sure some chuds will throw a tantrum. Block and parry, so to speak.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Officially there’s women’s and open tournaments. There isn’t anything stopping the top female player, Hou Yifan from going to a tourney and potentially playing the top (general and specifically male) player Magnus Carlsen.