The jury in Sean “Diddy” Combs’ sex trafficking trial said Tuesday that it has reached a verdict on four of five counts against the hip-hop mogul. But the partial decision remained under wraps after jurors were told to keep deliberating because they were stuck on the top charge, racketeering conspiracy.

Prosecutors, Combs’ defense team and Judge Arun Subramanian reasoned that after just two days of deliberations, it was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts. So rather than taking a partial verdict, Subramanian told the jury to continue weighing the remaining charge. Deliberations will continue Wednesday.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No, they can’t do that and rightfully so. The man was accused of a crime, and therefore he was a right to a trial by a jury of his peers for each and every charge.

    Not only just for the purposes of future appeals, but simply because the US Constitution grants every person in the US that right.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Isn’t that the whole purpose? Jury deliberates. They all agreed on 4. Couldn’t agree on 1. If you require the jury to be there day after day and you essentially hold them prisoner to do so because it is mandatory… How many days do you hold them until it is effecting their deliberation. If I make you miss your job for week, you may just agree to something to get out the door eventually. A hung jury can’t occur if the judge just says “keep deliberating” so there must be some cut off

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Now is the point in history where we have to actualize these wonderful ideas. The US Constitution is a flimsy piece of paper. The only strength it ever had is that which we lend to it, collectively.

      It’s all on us.

      my mood