no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 个月前Choose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square410fedilinkarrow-up1531arrow-down131
arrow-up1500arrow-down1imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 个月前message-square410fedilink
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up35·1 个月前2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 个月前2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
minus-squarehansolo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 个月前All of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom. Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
minus-squareBurninator05@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 个月前Five is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it. One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.
2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
Getting aboard the #2 train
Yeah, longest tines wins.
2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
All of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom.
Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
deleted by creator
Five is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it.
One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.