• 11 Posts
  • 263 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonemrule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 days ago

    MOGAI: marginalized orientations, gender alignments and intersex

    it’s an alternative label to lgbtq+, that afaik aims to be more abstract and include all queer people from the get go. unlike lgbtq, which only lists specific identities and therefor has to be extended all the time to include everyone, to the point where you for example can get LGBTTQQFAGPBDSM.

    mogai is also a (mainly online?) queer movement, from which the term originates and i think it lost a lot of popularity, if it ever had that much, which is probably why u didnt hear of it.

    there are arguments for and against the use of mogai over lgbtq+. i dont really care and just say queer :3









  • no offence, i do not appreciate links to corpo social media being spread on the fediverse.

    to make this a constructive criticism, could you maybe please instead reupload the video on a more open platform and share that instead? you can still link the original in the description if thats important to you.

    an easy way to download videos off corpo social media is cobalt tools.

    my reasoning for this is, that i (and many others) use the fediverse to escape corpo social media, and do not wish to have to return to it, in order to see posts.

    thanky, and pws don’t feel attacked. much love <3

    edit: here is the video for anyone who does not wanna interact with tiktok :3









  • this is the first time i hear about that “trans people are for pam people” thing.

    i know some ppl consider nombinary ppl to excluded from bi, but thats just ignorance or exclusionary bs, that is not even in line with the ethemology of the word.

    i personally simply vibe most with the pan label, because it is kinda seperate from gender, which fits my fuck gender mindest.


  • ofc its not a phobia to have preferences. my critique is towards excluding people from certain labels of gender based attraction, for things other than their gender. especially if those people are systemically opressed for their gender.

    crazy example now, but sometimes that helps seeing things in a new light:

    if i say that im not into old people because i am a lesbian, then thats kinda messed up, because it implies that old women are not women.

    does that help?

    and ofc, because we live in a cis-normative society, many people dont often think about how women can also have dicks. forgetting about that isnt necessairily transphobic but might also just be a cis-normative oopsy.