It was combined with a top 4 jungle primary that was not ranked choice, which was why a lot of people who might have voted for it otherwise voted against it. It looked like a way to implement ranked choice while creating a system where less moderate candidates would be eliminated in the primary.

People should protest somewhere else and draw attention away from the parade, not add to it.

But what if they hold him in contempt in El Salvador “by accident”?

There really isn’t a legally defined way. Shaming and pressuring resignations are probably the best way that is legally unambiguous, but arguments could be made for things like blockading or other means of coercion

That’s self-interest, not self-actualization. Part of self-actualizing is realizing you aren’t the center of the universe.

I think it’s a deeper disillusionment with the economy. Anyone who isn’t truly rich is coming to the conclusion that it’s becoming increasingly hard to get ahead in the economy over the long term, and the measures they use for economic health are becoming increasingly divorced from this reality. Things getting mildly better for some people over the recent past don’t offset people’s economic realities.

RiNo or somewhere else?

It shouldn’t be allowed for contracts of adhesion (take or leave it contracts for consumers). Mandatory binding arbitration should be limited to business to business negotiated contracts.

Now we just need a 6 hour hbomberguy video essay about Rajat Khare to really take this to the next level.