• 0 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 11th, 2024

help-circle
  • How do you know that? To this point, they have only run the winner of the primary in the general election. In 2024, they ran the winner of the primary, but when he dropped out, they ran his running mate instead. What did you expect them to do?

    If you want change to happen, you need to convince the voters. They control who the Democratic Party runs.


  • It looks like they aren’t ignoring you. They proposed a resolution, and they didn’t have the votes to get it passed. If you want change, vote for the ones who supported the resolution and primary the ones who didn’t while convincing voters to vote for the other candidate in the primary. Getting Trump elected just makes things worse. No Republicans are proposing these resolutions.


  • pfried@reddthat.comtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldlets stop thinking guys
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maybe? No, we know the answer to that: definitely not.

    There weren’t enough votes to do that yet, just like there weren’t enough votes to legalize gay marriage in 2008. In the reality we live in, California amended its constitution to ban gay marriage in 2008 by direct voter initiative. People who support gay marriage had to work to shift public attitudes while voting for the best option available, who said he didn’t support gay marriage (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/10/obama-frustrated-same-sex-marriage-david-axelrod-book) but then directed the DOJ not to defend DOMA in order for it to fail court challenges. Similarly, people fighting for civil rights had to shift public attitudes while voting for the best option available.

    In the reality we live in, 51% of Americans said their sympathies were with Israelis and 27% with Palestinians in 2024. In just the same way, people opposing genocide have to shift public attitudes while voting for the best option available.

    Doing otherwise means genocide stops later, and more people watch their friends die, as evacuation orders now cover half of Beirut. You didn’t have to let Trump win and kill schoolchildren in Iran with a triple tap strike. That was your decision made from not understanding the consequences of your actions.



  • Hey, maybe we could have gotten that in the next election while reducing casualties in the intervening four years by increasing Biden’s sanctions on settlers and his aid to Gaza instead of removing those on day 1 like Trump did, bombing Iran, and then pretending that the ceasefire agreement didn’t apply to Lebanon when the country that brokered the ceasefire agreement said it did.

    Lincoln also said blacks should be segregated and that he wouldn’t force an end to slavery, but if you voted for his opponent based on that, you made a bad choice. Always vote for the one who is better.


  • as if genocide wasn’t a big deal.

    The point is if that’s your issue, your choices haven’t made things better. In fact, it made things worse. On day 1, Trump removed Biden’s sanctions on West Bank settlers. On day whatever it was this week, Trump said that Lebanon was not part of the ceasefire agreement despite the country that brokered the agreement saying it was.

    I want to stop the genocide too, but I’m smart enough to know what my choices are. There isn’t a choice to stop the genocide immediately, but there is a choice to slow it down and get on a path where we stop it faster.






  • Yes, you made several incorrect claims about education. Not only are they not denied higher education like you originally claimed, but they are also given free lower education. Slaves were legally barred from being educated. I don’t understand why this stark difference is so difficult to understand.

    What does the age of my account have to do with anything? I would not be at all surprised if you made as many incorrect claims when your account was one day old as you make today, but I also would not be surprised if you made fewer incorrect claims then either.




  • They are denied one specific grant for higher education, but they are taught for free within the prison system and can pay for outside education themselves. This is different from being barred by law from learning to read.

    Your link does not say that they are denied by law from testifying in abuse cases. It just says that prison abuse happens.

    Their children are more likely to end up in prison, but they are not bound by law to the prison that their parents were in.

    Prisons do not force divorce.

    By saying that imprisonment is literally slavery, you are absolutely minimizing the horrors of chattel slavery.