without examining the source data, there is no way to verify this. the link at the bottom 404s and no other references are given

I’m not antivegan

that map uses flawed methodology

it counts almost all crop land as feed land

most crops are grown for human food oil fiber or fuel

the parts fed to animals are just secondary co products

feeding residual meal and pulp to livestock avoids waste

In this paper, we link a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to estimates from a review of 570 life-cycle assessments3 (LCAs)

lca studies are disparately methodized, and cannot be combined. this is junk science

this is a counterfactual and cannot be proven

it’s not

it’s one thing to do something ineffective, but be optimistic. it’s another to waste others time and morally grandstand if they won’t do ineffective things with you

this can’t be true

this is based on poore-nemecek 2018, which is not very good science

what I said is true.

Less people would be dead if Kamala had won

counterfactuals cannot be proven