A single “fuck you” button would be an innovative improvement.

Not sure if science is ready yet to accomplish such a task!

So where’s that miraculous cure, then?

Did you see the comic? The cure was destroyed by one of us :(

Looks perfect to me!

I started trying to get better at steaming small amounts of milk. I drink one coffee in the morning (30-40g espresso + 30g steamed milk).

All tutorials I found on YouTube use >250ml of milk. One dude even said that he “only” uses 200ml if he only steams milk for one drink.

How much milk do you guys put in your coffee??

I think there is a middle ground where you can absolutely build apps faster with the help of ai and still get maintainable code.

Just don’t let AI write a whole app in one shot. Or even whole features.

Which implies that the T-Rex already had a major role in a movie 55 million years ago and now I’m curious in what movie?

Nice!!

Please don’t feed sugar cubes to horses :(

We got through workdays without LLMs only a FEW years ago. Except the hype for AI not much has changed since then. This alone should be proof that it’s possible.

I hate this kind of reasoning.

“Let’s ignore this big problem because there are other bigger problems”

The same people say shit like: “Why are you sad? There are so many people who have it even worse than you!”

All this makes us do nothing until the “smaller” problems become so big that the damage is done and then those people will say “Well, we are in too deep. It it what it is. Can’t change it now 🤡”

Still running since 2020. No face plant, yet. It’s the most vanilla Arch + KDE install though so I don’t know what should be breaking.

Well, I sit on the toilet like in the picture and proceed to shit my pants like it’s supposed to be done. No poop hole needed sir!

Also you’re not supposed to pull down your pants.

You’re right, you definitely should treat sex offenders way harsher.

Also if a school says “don’t do X or you WILL fail the test and MIGHT get expelled” and then you proceed to do X then I think it’s on you and not ‘bad treatment’ at all. Especially if you do X repeatedly.

I’m all for teaching tech literacy. It’s one of the most important skills. However, if a task is about writing your own thoughts in your own words then maybe you should prevent cheating by limiting access to tools like llms or have better supervision.

If the task involves using technology then the task should be adapted so you still need your own mind to solve it (obviously).

Yeah true. The blacklisting goes way too far.

I think it’s not so steep if students are told beforehand. Tell them what counts as cheating. Tell them the consequences. Tell them it’s serious.

In university I always had to sign a little text that informed us that we are not allowed to cheat and that doing so would lead to failing the test and potentially getting expelled.

It sounds silly but “running the program from your head” is a super important skill as a programmer. It’s what you do when you read and try to understand other people’s code.

Or at least give students computers that have restricted or no access to the internet? Even before LLMs having access to the internet would have been a huge opportunity to cheat. At least in most subjects.

Also, what happened to teachers/supervisors walking around and checking if the students cheat? Back when I went to school we also cheated with cheat sheets or exchanging answers but it was always risky because getting busted meant failing the test (or worse).

Letting students use the internet unrestrictedly would be like the teacher leaving the room and leaving us unsupervised for the duration of the test back in my days.

I get the frustration. However, the satisfaction to build something this way weighed always bigger when the project was completed and working. At least for me.