oce 🐆

I try to contribute to things getting better, sometimes through polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with your comment ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to refine the arguments that make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.

  • 8 Posts
  • 804 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lutopics@lemmy.worldHappy Man
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    8 days ago

    Do some people here not realize that if we start allowing this kind of extra-judiciary assassinations, it’s not only going to happen to who you think are the bad guys? Next one could be an opposition party leader or the spokesperson of a minority defense non-profit.










  • oce 🐆@jlai.lutoComic Strips@lemmy.worldThe Sunk Cost Fallacy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Yes, that’s a good example for something that follows the rational use case. But let’s not take a toxic relationship extreme, I think in the case of a human relationship, the sunk cost may sometimes positivly contribute to the affection/intimacy/love. The sunk cost created memories, habits, foundations for a relationship that you cannot just suddenly ignore and only look at what comes in the future.
    I think one must be careful about applying rational principles telling you to not listen to your emotions to subjects where reason doesn’t play the main role.