we can’t know what would have happened if she had won because she didn’t win.
I don’t see anyone saying she would have invaded iran, though, so I’ve never had the opportunity to educate such a person on the unprovableness of nonfactuals
we can’t know what would have happened if she had won because she didn’t win.
I don’t see anyone saying she would have invaded iran, though, so I’ve never had the opportunity to educate such a person on the unprovableness of nonfactuals
“you have to put a unique spin on it”
dont fucking tell me what to do
you’re really confusing. a minute ago I thought you wanted me to vote for the democrats
people voting is how we got every president but gw bush.
they were all terrible.
no more presidents.
I don’t know, fucking genius, you tell me
Are you a fucking fascist and trying to play around here and confuse people, or are you willfully this fucking goddamn fucking stupid? Either way, fascists certainly adore your contribution to the conversation.
" And every Nader voter who was not an idiot know from the polls that Nader would not win."
future knowledge is an impossibility
“With Gore instead of Bush, there would have been no Iraq War, for one thing”
this can’t be proven, either
“If everybody who voted Nader had voted for Gore instead, there would have been no wiggle room for the Supreme Court to butt in.”
this can’t be proven
the democrats or the republicans?
you can’t know what would happen in a world where there were never guns. I’m not asking for anything. I’m pointing out we can’t possibly know what such a world would look like
gore won that election. the supreme Court stole it.
since you can’t prove a counterfactual, we will never know


oof. one week old account shilling for israel
one week old account shilling for a political party


where is the full paper?
The people of Myanmar used 3D printed guns to overthrow their government.
I’m starting to think you just don’t know what you’re talking about.
you don’t need to accept either claim. you can suspend judgement.
try reading into epistemology
agnostic is a viable third option
this does not give us access to an alternate reality in which kamal won. it’s just storytelling. there is no evidence for it because there can be no evidence for it.