They have to expand and term limit SCOTUS. Dilute his power, incentivize good behavior and force him out eventually

It’d be really nice if they clustered by instance. Then one could theoretically follow all politicians in their favorite party without having to look them up manually.

Sometimes local subscribers is nice to know. Maybe not more important than total subscribers, but useful nonetheless. Especially on a small/specific instance where you get to know your instance-mates, you might want to know how many of them are following a thing and whether you’re about to introduce them to something entirely new.

Well would you look at that

Expand and term-limit SCOTUS. This system is ridiculous

Oh but getting sucked into random bullshit is what they want

Same

I know he says it’s pronounced “jif”, but I just don’t care. It’s like “gift” without the t

Not to mention the study confirmed that the two groups has similar mortality before covid and before the vaccines

Sometimes the obvious answer is wrong, but there are plenty of other reasons to run this study. Advocacy is better with real numbers backing it up, there are probably similar circumstances that are less obvious that now warrant a closer look…

I think the commenter didn’t notice that the analysis controlled for age through stratification. You’re right that that confounding variable is taken care of.

That’s kind of the problem I think. I was able to find like 2 people there I want to follow. Lemmy is going to be far more successful at displacing its alternative because all the communities you’d want to subscribe to are here.

No. My other instance is WireBase.org. It’s a smaller one

It’s type 2 fun. You don’t want to do it, but you’re glad you did when you do

They definitely should not write bills in such a way that the opposition is excluded from its benefits. That’s a real bad precedent. Imagine a security situation where blue states are forsaken by the military.

I believe Trump even mused about something like this, which is how you know it’s unethical.

Honestly it’s weird to me that they haven’t been part of NATO all along. What’s the story there?

Ironic that you criticized the comment for hyperbole and then use the straws an fallacy to try to shoot it down. The comment did not claim that all 350 million people are racist. You just acted like it did so you could criticize it.

And yes, the US is an amazing country with far fewer racists than ever before. I agree with you there.

This post is about a government contract that is racist in nature. Is that close enough for you?

It’s funny because Facebook was the original dumpster fire

Thanks for the FYI! I didn’t know it worked like that. How much influence does a single person have over what appears in the All feed? Let’s suppose I find an obscure community and subscribe, and I’m the first person from Lemmy.World to do so. Do posts from that community immediately start showing up in everyone’s All feeds? Or does it take a small army of us subscribing to the same community to make it really show up?