The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

At least we don’t use the Roman method of varied hour lengths depending in the time of day and times of year.

It also works both ways: invest in passenger rail, services can improve, and so more people will use trains.

It’s electioneering in that it is to create damage control ahead of dropping or delaying any promised reward to those that voted for the income tax cut.

It can allow them to defer until they claim that NZ is not fragile, which would probably be as a re-election campaign: vote for us because WE fixed a fragile economy, let’s keep the momentum so that we can let people keep more of their hard earned income.

I don’t have an example, but I would like to see a rotary phone dial ui as input method for a phone number.

Edit: I see there’s mentions and a gif in another comment.

is the number of people still arriving in…

Don’t have to be a a great and prosperous country to have people want to move here. Just have to be better than where they are (with respect to their personal circumstances).

Is “selling ground leases” mean they sell the land and lease the property? If so, sounds dumb.

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

Local companies may have similar names to others that exist overseas.

To require them to be in a globally common non-regionalised pool of domain names is more likely to increase scam risks.

Should the various regional companies of the Vodafone brand be forced to have all their world wide customers sign in to a global parent organisation Vodafone.com? Is it not better for the regionally specific customer portal be vodafone.com.au and vodafone.co.uk?

How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?

I’m not gonna defend Countdown but I’m pretty sure there extra points above the standard per order earn rate.

Adding some gamification of their loyalty scheme.

Ten years ago sure, the days I’d suggest matrix instead.

Or convert list to electorate.

I just want to add that viable alternatives to driving means that those who don’t want to drive, or are unable to drive, or who should not be driving, they then do not have to drive.

The people who scraped through and eventually passed the driving test, but even after a number of years driving are barely competent then don’t need to be driving.

When driving isn’t necessary for personal mobility, then the licensing and testing can be much stricter, or, as strict as necessary for safety without as much backlash.

At minimum I want intercity services on our existing train lines.

I don’t want to drive between home in Whangarei and mum/family in Auckland. There already exists a train line, let me pay for tickets.

Nice.

On the Road to Zero point. The only way to reduce crashes to a near zero quantity is to reduce the number of cars and car trips. Which can only be achieved by providing viable alternatives to driving. Which would ideally be intercity, regional, and city trains that don’t just cater to the 9-5 work day commuter.