

Why do you say it’s sovereign when it’s clearly not? Like, it doesn’t change anything about your argument, so why lie?


Why do you say it’s sovereign when it’s clearly not? Like, it doesn’t change anything about your argument, so why lie?
Can you stop a casino from rigging its games by playing in the casino?
According to a quick internet search, an average fridge takes 1-2kWh per day, so that’s at least 7kWh per week.
Making an image takes ~20 seconds. My computer, for example, has a 700W PSU, so it can’t draw more power than that. That’s at most 0.004kWh.
Well if 0.004kWh takes more energy than 7kWh then it’s not worth it.
Seems like your statement is going to the else branch.


I have a feeling this is actually a llm benchmarking fan in disguise. Look at the perfect benchmark chart. It even has cost-per-task.


bot
Scratch a copyright advocate, and a dehumanizer bleeds.


A sob story about the poor widdle smol bean petit bourgeois, making a proprietary closed source game to rent seek off of.
Why should I care about this class enemy?
You class traitors never care about actual working class people.


Let me try that again:
if your an accountant and you boss
copy your accounting sheets anddo not pay you, it is not stealing? Youbothhave the file, for you it won’t make you any money,
The copying part is gone, yet the problem stays the same, so the copying was never the problem.


Private property is theft. “Intellectual property” is a form of private property. It exclusively benefits the bourgeois.
Regarding your third bullet point: Try your example again, but this time the boss doesn’t copy the file. It’s still labor theft. The copying is irrelevant.


corporate propaganda
You’re spreading RIAA’s corporate propaganda right now:
intellectual property theft
Copying is not theft
“Intellectual property” only benefits the bourgeoise


stealing
Stealing: when you don’t have it anymore afterwards.
Copying: when both have it afterwards
The RIAA’s propaganda campaign was sadly very successful.


“Everyone who disagrees with me is stupid” - your brain on idealism
You don’t get what copyright is at all. The bourgie propaganda seems to have convinced you that “copyright protects you from copyright and if it weren’t there nothing would protect you from copyright”
For some people, it’s easier to imagine the end of the world, than to imagine the end of capitalism the copyright system.
“Copyright” was made to empower and protect large corpos like microsoft.
If you think copyright “protects” linux in any way, you’re a fool.
You can call it “the truth”, but I will call it “the dogma”.
TIL radlibs’ holy scripture smears copyleft. The page reads like it was written by a bourgie copyright advocate.
I should have known, radlibs’ holy scripture was founded by ancaps after all.
while still promoting copyright for copyleft’s sake.
What the hell.
Copyleft means “the absence of copyright”, not “copyright wielded by radlibs”.
This is the GPL’s trap card. When it gets undermined, the “copyright” system loses its credibility.
That was the idea, at least. Seems like there’s people who double down on their belief in copyright in response. But that’s their own fault.
The usual saying applies: “It’s easier for them to imagine the end of the world, than the end of capitalism the copyright system.”
Cheaters are annoying because they win.
If the new projects were all as useless as you claim, you wouldn’t compare them to cheating.
This is a direct contradiction. My conclusion: You’re salty that they are more useful than your projects.
I assume it’s due to phone keyboards.