How is a complaint about script quality somehow disproven by Veo 3, a video generation AI?
Did you ask an AI to come up with a reply?
How is a complaint about script quality somehow disproven by Veo 3, a video generation AI?
Did you ask an AI to come up with a reply?
Oh I remember your username now. Yeah, its never worth talking to you is it.
There’s an entire world out there beyond Israel and the US.
Attaching herself to the latest cause célèbre? Are you clinically insane? She is boarding a ship not liking an Instagram post
That’s why very few people are able to do what she’s doing, and why she’s extremely brave to leverage that: she announced that’s her ship, where she is and why she is there. Killing Greta would be the kind of media storm that Israel would not want to deal with, especially given their strategy of pretending criticism of peaceful beautiful Israel = being an antisemitic ass. Hard to keep this false dichotomy if you kill a generational icon.
Have you used DLSS or are you extrapolating FSR 1080p and believing it looks the same?
I didn’t claim it doesn’t work. I claimed there’s a reason out of hundreds of releases, you have a singular example of a forward renderer.
Which means TAA will keep being a problem, so my remark that DLSS is miles ahead applies to pretty much all games, even if once in a blue moon you find an exception.
There’s a reason you had to fish for an exception to find a modern game with a forward rendering engine.
I’ll take DLSS over any other AA solution any day.
We no longer use forward renderers, AA either looks like ass or comes with a massive performance cost, and it can’t fix noise from foliage, alphas, smoke, etc. DLSS fixes all three issues at once.
We can’t criticise a massive price increase on games and insane markups for a 480p webcam in 2025 because… People are having fun?
I mean, I can have lots of fun with asbestos too.
My comment is got blast processing, so I win
The lobotomized chimp with a typewriter trained on internet comments is now reproducing internet commentary? I’m shocked!
Just ask Grok to fix the servers, AI is so much better than humans right?
The fact it’s now super easy to generate content and copy others means people won’t be motivated to create many original pieces.
Which in turn means less material for the AI to train and copy, and at some point, it will become obvious it’s recycling variations of the same initial training set.
One example where this is not just a theoretical: SEO people quickly figured out they could ask AI to edit an article and it would rank better for all keywords selected, so they did. But the AI is just mixing snippets from other sources with their own quirky language. So now everyone’s pages look the same, and provide no original material, so they are back to ranking lower because they’re all fighting with the same amount of information.
Whenever we suggest starting to test sperm for known genetics conditions, somebody starts screaming eugenics, which then halts the debate and we end up not testing for things we absolutely can test for.
Oh tell me your joking, this profoundly ruins he and every single one of his roles forever for me
You can’t trust those “app has tracking in it” flags because they usually have scary wording for extremely basic and normal things that wouldn’t impact your privacy.
An app anonymously tracks if an user clicks a button or not. This becomes “ThIs APp pHOnEs HomE tRaCkiNg uSErS”
Recruiter: “Oh, I see you left your previous company soon after joining, what happened there?”
“They used Microsoft products, so I refused to touch the computers”
Recruiter “…”
Make sure users trust it so much they can no longer discern hallucinations and lies from reality, then keep the AI training on content generated by itself.
That’s a fair point in general, and a good reminder.
But a person using AI is telling me they don’t value their own mind to the point they rather outsource it to a dumb prediction machine, so why exactly am I supposed to entertain their commentary?