https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262046305/introduction-to-algorithms/
This one is pretty hardcore. I bought the 2nd edition of it over 20 years ago when I started my career as a developer due to not doing a CS degree.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262046305/introduction-to-algorithms/
This one is pretty hardcore. I bought the 2nd edition of it over 20 years ago when I started my career as a developer due to not doing a CS degree.
Also take a look at the Specification Pattern for something similar.
That’s something I would only use if the logic becomes very complex, but it can help break things down nicely in those cases.
An annual degradation of 1.8% over 20 years gives more than 69% capacity the end of the period, so it’s better than what you posted.
Each year, you have 0.982 of the previous year’s capacity (1 - 0.018), so the capacity at the end of the 20 years is 0.982 ^ 20.
Why the assumption that reactivity is only a front-end thing?
I’ve used it plenty on the back-end when dealing with streams of data that need to trigger other processing steps.
First Contact main theme > all
Guessing they’ve never gone more than 31 days without an accident or they would have needed a bigger sign
Apparently it’s because CrowdStrike installed their device driver as one that must start when Windows starts.
Explained here: https://youtu.be/wAzEJxOo1ts?feature=shared&t=675
I’ve linked to the specific time where he explains that issue, but tbh the whole video is worth watching.
deleted by creator
I’ve read all nine and I can’t say that I noticed any real differences between the two.
Each chapter in the books is written from a specific character’s perspective. From what I understand, each of the characters was written consistently by one author or the other. So, for instance, all the Naomi chapters would be written by the same person. They may not have stuck 100% to that, but I think that’s how they tried to fit things together.
It bothers me that the height chart suggests there are 10 inches in a foot
Specifically, this is Eixample
The roads in the old city are much more chaotic.
I still remember the code for Braeburn Apples, over 25 years after I worked in a supermarket.
For some reason, their code of 6969 sticks in my mind.
Maybe let’s just say that you and I have different senses of humour and leave it at that.
For me, the humour comes from the fact that I pretended not to understand the image and point out that there are no plugs in the image. It’s a bit of wordplay that relies on the fact that people sometimes call plug sockets plugs.
I’m from the UK.
It was a joke. Don’t take things so seriously
Sure, there’s a lot of plug sockets there, but I don’t see a single plug in that image
And at this point, the extended crew of the Discovery was thoroughly sidelined: Burnham’s personal relationships took priority over everything else.
This is the part that I’ve never got on well with in Discovery.
In TNG, it’s not a show about Picard, or Riker, or any of the other individuals. It’s a show about the crew. I’ve even seen it said that the actual star of the show is the ship.
Whereas, with Disco, it’s a show about Michael Burnham and everyone else has a bit part. That always felt weird for a Star Trek show. I want to see how the crew works together to solve problems and overcome things with everyone on an equal footing regardless of their rank in the show.
And I think that’s why there was such a warm reception to season 3 of Picard. It brought the crew back together. Picard alone isn’t satisfying enough. What we wanted was him as part of the crew.
And he created Trello
Fun fact. The river that these falls are on turns into the infamous Bolton Strid a little further south.
Or is that just what you want us to think?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widdershins
Just because it sounds cool.