6500 workers wasted on this crap.

What’s the “near” in the “near bomb-part uranium” part then? Just a lower ratio of U235?

What does “the underlying data is a bit messy” mean? Is it just guesstimated? Is it easy to know what traffic comes from a bot vs human?

That’s hilarious, I didn’t know you could add tags to users.

I think it is the last one for OpenAI. Like a draft or thread about their S-1 form

Makes sense. “Everyone” knows a lot about windows’ jargon and UX due to its prominence in education, work and consumer market (turns out for-profit corpos have a bunch of money to throw around). I wish I knew about Linux when I was much younger :(

Vacuum based systems?

Is it already on polymarket?

Wait until you see the female version

IIRC Portugal isn’t even well connected to Spain by train. I think there’s a twice a day connection between Porto and Vigo in the north. Not sure about the southern part.

I use CTRL+D a lot, but I didn’t know it was a send EOF command. Why does that close the session / terminal?

Also, the undo shortcut is also pretty nice (CTRL+_ ?) and missing there

Not fast enough

Why? Are they vampires?

No

How did you tell them no? Just straight out?

Is there a place that collects which prompts can be used for these things in an up to date way?

Sleep helped. Also, the FOSDEM link you sent. I was not aware of that was going on.

I can’t find the article, but this was the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11988.

I just wanted to point out that the myriad of “best practice” articles and information on AI are not very rigorous. So, not even necessarily an argument against AI (the paper sure isn’t). Even then it got pushback.

I’m lost

This is exactly my experience. Even when sharing milquetoasty articles, like the AGENTS.md one just to test the waters.