Do they look like equivalent questions to you?

A source might give evidence for something that happened in the real world, while these last questions were about what goes on in that silly head of yours.

Lol I finally ask something you’re qualified to answer and suddenly you have no opinion.

Well, it’s true that this is very simple. I wanted the poster’s source – if there is one. Unless you’re claiming to be them, you don’t have that information.

But since you seem very interested, do you personally think the CCP death estimate you keep presenting is accurate?

You say the commenter above was wrong, but your tone suggests you still agree with them. Do you believe the rest of their narrative that student protestors were peacefully dispersed in song by the unarmed army choir?

Do you recognize that CPC has a conflict of interest in providing accurate information about this, and that they continue to censor information about it to this day?

So just to clarify, you think that:

1.) you can provide the correct source for another person’s statement

2.) what you posted qualifies as a source even though you did not give one

3.) it’s OK if the statement does not agree with the source

4.) you can justify your misattribution by cherry-picking a number that “roughly” agrees if you massage it

Bruh.

IDK why you’re trying to source someone else’s comment for them, but if you read the comment and the wiki you would see that they are not in agreement.

This is why I asked for their source. Sorry if you find that offensive for some reason lol

Since we’re evidently reading the same Wikipedia article, I’ll point out that those are among the lowest estimates on the page and the Beijing hospital record was 478 dead and 920 wounded.

But these are all very different numbers from what was commented.

Do you have a source for your estimate of deaths? 100+ is very ambiguous since it includes any number >100, which seems already beyond contention.

I tried to play classic ff7 on steam the other day and it booted up a windows 98-era mandatory square enix login portal ☠️

These are actually separate issues. TPB isn’t legally responsible for theft if someone leaks an unreleased song. But, the publishing company can sue them for damages related to lost income based on TPB’s distribution of content.

Are platforms responsible for the content their users post? No. Rules for unusual situations (CSAM, terrorism, copyright, etc) have been established for probably decades by this point.

An online chat/message board is not comparable to an image generator because the company is not creating potentially harmful content.

What evidence is needed? Just have some eyewitness testimony and send it out to the jury.

The Pentagon is doing less so that means we can reduce its funding, right?

Honestly I’m just amused that the photo is the part that’s not plausible

Depends on the lender but usually like $4-8k. It’s bet that you won’t want to change the terms of the mortgage again until your balance is lower than it would be otherwise.

Oh damn, probably I could have claimed that then. Thanks for the tip!

Yeah, just out of warranty unfortunately

65" Hisense TV. Bought it new and 1.5 years later the motherboard died. Scoured the Internet for the part and it turned out Hisense didn’t even sell it, you had to buy secondhand used boards.

But it must have been a common problem b/c over ~6 months even the resellers were permanently sold out. Recycled it in the original packaging.

IMO companies like that should be forced to recycle every scrap of their e-waste themselves.

I always dislike these questions where you’re expected to have the answer partway through the passage to meet time requirements.

What if the last sentence reverses the conclusion and the structure of the exam leads you to miss it?

They need a treaty that provides for consequences when Israel breaks it.

Unfortunately causing damage is almost always much easier than protecting against it. For a deadly virus this seems especially true because someone could have a lab in their garage and die once it’s created, but to study it afterward would require extreme care.

So say a few bastards release 1000 variants of different super-viruses instead of just one. Then the research and infrastructure needed to counter them multiply potentially to an unrealistic level.

Also if someone can create super-ebola, that doesn’t mean a vaccine could also be created.