Aww the cheap shot guilt by association shit isnt working to smear every socialist-aligned candidate? Time to get new material.

The problem for Republicans is that senate races can’t be gerrymandered. Sounds like this provision would solve that problem for them. You can just smell the desperation and fear.

Replace trans with any other identity and you will see how utterly ridiculous this is.
Imagine if racists started demanding a government-enforced “racial” warning for shows featuring non-whites. That’s how this current era of anti-LGBT bigotry is going to be seen by people in the future, and we should be embarassed to let our society be associated with it.

Really sounds like this should result in a massive class action lawsuit, but I wont hold my breath.

That gets much more difficult when AI is used to empower the police/surveillance state that serves the interest of capitalists.

Meanwhile, in functional countries this would be a non-story, because everyone would have guaranteed access to tax funded medical care already.

That describes my entire life since adolescence… wondering what kind of society we could have had if we werent governed by sociopaths

Pretty sure thats already a thing in the UK actually.

Don’t let them or the media convince you that their actions are passive. They have had many opportunities to put the brakes on this administration, and every time they deliberately side with Trump. Every Republican congressperson is complicit with his agenda.

$2320 per cm; or $232 per mm

Great points, I think you’re on to something.
I think the old saying “Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity” doesn’t apply when malice and corporate interests are in alignment. Now I’m curious to dig into who actually wrote the bill, and who are they financially supported by…

Already contacted my assembly person to oppose it. I get the intent behind it, but theres no way im going to ask the government for permission to use my own hardware.
I dont even own a 3D printer yet, but I wouldn’t want to be subject to such a bad and dumb law if and when that changes.

If it ever came to armed conflict, not having guns means you lose by default. Obviously having a gun does not make you invincible, and it’s a lazy strawman to imply that is what people are thinking.

You’re correct, of course. But there are still a certain amount of Republican voters who like to pretend they have principles. Then there are also so-called centrists and politically disengaged folks. Sometimes they need to be reminded exactly who these charlatans are, so there can be no excuse for confusing one side of the political spectrum with the other.

“The ICE Office of Professional Responsibility will conduct a thorough investigation.”

I think we’re all a little too old for fairy tales here.

Dead men tell no tales. We’re pirates, remember?

Conversely, if a minority is losing out, then you are WINNING!

Come on, this has to be satire, right?