Not having to interact with Nazis is tied to which instance I signed up on? I’m confused by this argument.

I think this makes them a good human… Since like 99% of humans are bad at math it makes sense since they would make this mistake…

I feel like people need an education about the difference between spirit of the law and letter of the law.

This comment reads like this:

“I posted some truly heinous shit and a mod/admin removed it but I didn’t break any written rules therefore my right to force other people to be subjected to my desires was impinged upon😭😭😭😭.”

A thousand novel mistakes.

The two cases, they knew what it was and they did it maliciously. They didn’t know what they were doing and got socially engineered in the process. Both cases are cause for failure.

Sure. But for an entry level interview as a pen tester… Scanning with Kali should be an easy task.

Using Kali? Easy if you have training. The capstone for our security course a decade ago was too find and exploit 5 remote machines (4 on the same network, 1 was on a second network only one of the machines had access to) in an hour with Kali. I found all 5 but could only exploit 3 of them. If I didn’t have to exploit any of them 7 would be reasonably easy to find.

Kali basically has a library of known exploits and you just run the scanner on a target.

This isn’t novel exploit discovery. This is “which of these 10 windows machines hasn’t been updated in 3 years?”

Ah. I see. So it’s not that you can’t get them it’s that they are expensive and you are looking for a reasonably priced way to get one. That makes sense.

Online? I’m confused, do they not ship to Greece?

Lol. This isn’t my argument. This is your argument followed more completely.

You don’t even know what my argument is or what my beliefs are. All I have done is point out your own hypocrisy.

You know how I know you are lying? Because your first reaction to me expanding on your argument was to tell me I am a sinner.

If you treat any of your “friends” that way you are truly a terrible person.

You don’t like being called a fundamentalist because you know they are abhorrent.

You don’t like your own argument. You can’t even stomach the inkling that your own hypocrisy.

Removed by mod

Even if we grant you your invalid position, you are still wrong. So close. You claim the unborn person has rights, but so did the mother.

In no legal jurisdiction in the United States is one person ever required to give up their bodily autonomy for another. This the mother, according to your argument, is under no legal obligation to provide the other person, according to your argument, the mothers body for any reason. If the mother wishes to discontinue the use of her body she can. If the other person dies as a result of this decision, the mother bears no responsibility.

This is well understood case law and common law.

GTFO with this terrible argument.

Exactly. The points you put together made no argument. I asked “so what?” And indicated that the points as presented appear to be the same points people use/put together to say: “so don’t vote.” / are used by the same group of people who are trying to disenfranchise or discourage voting. This is a common propaganda technique.

I haven’t made up shit. I stated what it looked like and they failed to repudiate it followed by calling me names.

See. This is the big where your argument seems insincere.

Again. And?

It still sounds like you are one of those “it’s broken so don’t vote” assholes.

And? Just because I am not a fan of how the democratic party is run doesn’t mean I’m not going to vote for them.

There are a lot of problems… But this argument is awfully close to apologetics for Trump.

Win12 confirmed 2044 release date.