• 1 Post
  • 9 Comments
Joined 20 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2026

help-circle



  • Well, yes and no.

    It’s true that the project originally started around my own hardware and personal needs. However, that mainly influenced choices such as the preinstalled Flatpaks, GNOME extensions, and default configuration. The work required to rebuild the image around the CachyOS kernel, automate the build process, sign the resulting packages, run smoke tests, and provide tools for switching CPU schedulers is not specific to my hardware. Other users can benefit from it as well. That is precisely why, after initially building it for myself, I worked on making the process reproducible and suitable for public distribution. The image can run on different Intel and AMD systems, and I have also created an NVIDIA image so that the project can be tested on hardware other than my own. Your point about the signing keys is fair: they are currently personal keys rather than keys managed by an established organization. This is still a small independent project, so it doesn’t have the same governance or trust model as a large distribution. However, the entire build process is public, and users can inspect it or rebuild the image themselves.

    As for whether it qualifies as a “distribution,” I agree that simply publishing an ISO as a torrent on the Internet Archive would not be enough. But that’s not what defines the project. The project includes automated image and package builds, kernel integration, signing, testing, Secure Boot support, custom tools, and reproducible GitHub Actions workflows. Whether someone prefers to call it a distribution, a Universal Blue derivative, or a custom Fedora image is partly a matter of terminology, but it is certainly more than a manually modified ISO uploaded as a torrent. You can inspect the build history and the amount of automation involved here: https://github.com/daniel-g-carrasco/margine-image/actions