OP- Consider removing the 3 “opens new tab” statements. Those are an artifact of how you copied the article’s content.
OP- Consider removing the 3 “opens new tab” statements. Those are an artifact of how you copied the article’s content.
I checked tineye and it didn’t find any other copies of this image. Says it was posted to imgur yesterday.
https://tineye.com/search/3518bf0ca837e6e509d9c43e7c772c455e4ab33d?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
A source for those interested: https://substack.com/home/post/p-151721941
To anyone that hasn’t yet seen the movie Idiocracy, watch it now. Best documentary you’ll ever watch.
I recently saw another lemming call LLMs “spicy autocomplete” instead of AI which seemed appropriate given that calling it AI, while technically correct, I think leads some people to think that the LLM is intelligent. I plan to use that terminology.
Do you see the comment from user “Maalus” immediately prior to the comment that you first replied to? That’s where it was said.
If you cannot see that comment it’d be interesting to understand why. Maybe you have blocked that user so can’t see his comment but you are seeing replies to it?
CyberArk is a commercial product that attacks this problem space. It puts an agent process on the host next to your app. Only processes whose fingerprint matches those authorized to access a credential are allowed to fetch it. That fingerprint can be based on the host (known list of production hosts), the os user ID that owns the pid, the path to the executable for the pid, and probably a few more items.
Under that model your app just needs to know the environment that it wants (inject however you want) and the userid it wants to use. At runtime it reaches out to the local cyberark agent to obtain the password secret.
We’ve seen his lawyer go to prison before and that pattern may repeat here. We’ll just have to see whether he ends up seeing the inside of a cell along with them.
States co-signing it: Indiana, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, and South Carolina
Congrats, you made me wonder what the specifics were enough to look it up.
Here’s the case info for anyone else that’s similarly curious: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html