What bash scripts are you writing that you expect to run on both a Mac laptop and a production linux server? You can install the newer bash if that’s what you’re used to, but you’re surely going to run into issues like ls . -lah far quicker than differences in bash since 3.2

Even on a linux desktop you’re going to have differences from a production server, you’d want to be using something like ansible, or replicating production in a local test environment in a container or VM. Exactly like you have done.

How’d you end up being the only one at your workplace to be given a Mac? Even with a linux VM, being on ARM can cause issues with compatibility.

If your script starts with #!/bin/bash, both bash and zsh will run it fine. The bigger problem is the programs, filesystem and libraries being different. Which is why POSIX exists, if you’re looking to write stuff that works across systems.

I couldn’t tell if you were honestly asking for explanations or if all of your complaints sum up to “it’s different and I don’t like that”. Which honestly, fair.

Like, why is bash ancient? (3.2 vs 5) To avoid GPLv3, zsh is the new default.

Why is there no package manager Mac App store is the official one, can also install brew, macports, pkgsrc, or nix. Or use language/runtime specific ones like npm, pip, cargo, go.

Why are the utils like ls and friends flag-order-sensitive They avoid GNU versions of utilities, for similar licencing fears as avoiding modern bash. That said ls . -lah is unhinged, I don’t know any other unix derived ls that supports that.

Why do I have 40 network devices with cryptic names? Yeah they got some weirdo Apple stuff

Gotta preach for the cult of ZFS. It’s check summing, copy on write, and zraid features are all exactly what you want for data resilience. Plus you get transparent compression, and snapshots that can provide a bit of a stop-gap for your lack of backups.

It will normally soak up any and all memory for buffers and caches, but is meant to quickly free up when it’s needed by an app. Linux already does this on any filesystem with its page cache.

Oh and mounting a ZFS dataset on a new machine is super quick and easy, it stores it’s config on the drives themselves, so you can plug them into a new box and zpool import -af and boom it’s mounted and ready to go.

I remember when I was a kid messing with Windows 95/98, I had this intuitive feeling of what was happening under the hood. Just like how you describe your theory. Honestly you’re probably on the right track. In theory on linux you can actually dive into the source code and try to figure out what’s actually happening, but that’s intimidating AF. Hard to say if the problem is between wine and the Direct Rendering Manager (DRM), X11, Wayland, KDE, or the GPU driver…

I had a kind of similar problem with my display not outputting when it was connected. I had to use a DRM file in /sys and udev script to fix it, wrote a blog about it. If your monitors are still messed up after a reboot, it sounds like this won’t help you though.

Also you made me lol to “wine strikes me more as an emulator”. It totes is. The “Wine Is Not an Emulator” name is a joke, the original name was “WINdows Emulator”, which they changed to avoid Microsoft’s lawyers.

That is simultaneously ridiculous and amazing. Blindly clicking the buttons to enable the screen definitely proves you’re getting familiar with the OS.

Why do you think wine/Bricklink messed it up in the first place?

I’ve always geeked out about fan curves and monitoring, though I readily admit for most PCs leaving the default BIOS curve works fine enough.

I just used the free chat with Claude, it created and tracked the files in its own webchat thingy. Being a kernel module, I was happy to manually check, copy/paste, compile, then run the code for each iteration.

Porting postmarketOS to a phone sounds like it may require some amount of manual running and explaining results back to the chat. Ultimately the output only starts to get functional when it hits reality and needs to keep adapting to feedback.

I wrote a blog on the process that more focuses on the journey and technical details of the controller chip.

I used a very similar method in a similar situation to albb0920. They describe it as vibe coding too.

The exact chip that handles everything is undocumented, but similar ones in the same series have datasheets. A maintained version of the linux driver handily collated all of the available datasheets and configurations used by different motherboards. Between that and my microcontroller/hardware experience, that side of things wasn’t too bad.

What I didn’t know anything about was writing an Illumos driver. I used the chatbot with a free claude account, compiling and running the code manually myself. I was impressed that it was able to build out the boilerplate and get something going at all. Course it took a few tried to get something that compiled and worked somewhat correctly. At some points I needed to look through the generated code and point out exactly what what wrong, but at least it would address it.

Code running in the context of the kernel is definitely not something I would have autonomously executing by a LLM. The end result is absolutely not something I would want put into the official Illumos source.

This from the company that started the netbook trend with the $400 eeePC in 2007…

Nah I’m built different.

Sorry I might have misunderstood, you mentioned giving others access externally and it working fine. Normally, if you’ve set up the service to be publicly accessible on the internet, you can just visit the same site through the public DNS record and your public IP. At home or elsewhere, it’s all the same internet.

So either you’ve done something odd, or you’re talking about different, more private, internal only services?

Can you live with the services routing out and back into your public IP? If it all works for external users on the internet, doing nothing special should mean it works for you too?

God I hate that video, he explains everything so badly to the point of completely misinforming viewers. He’s talking about a special situation of AC current, but uses DC in the thought experiment. He makes it seem as if the field travels to the load in a direct path and the wires don’t matter. No, the EM field is completely based on the wire.

In my head I thought one could make relatively cheap high capacity in 2.5" SATA form factor by having more NAND chips of lower capacity. You give up speed and PCB space but that’s fine since bandwidth and IOPS are limited by SATA anyway and there’s plenty of space compared to M.2.

Turns out to not shake out that way, controller ICs that support SATA aren’t coming out any more, and NAND ICs are internally stacked to use up channels while not taking up PCB space.

There are some enterprise options, but they’re mad expensive.

I have 4x 6TB HDDs in my NAS. Around 5 years ago I decided to simply replace any dead drives with 6TB ones instead of my previous strategy of slowly upgrading their size. I figured I could swap to 8TB 2.5" SATA SSDs that had just started to exist and would surely only get cheaper in the future…

Back in the day I used a raspberry pi 3 for 1080p h.264 and steam link / moonlight. Problem was omxplayer plays up to 1080p60 beautifully, but anything else would struggle. Eventually ‘upgraded’ to an old laptop to easily YouTube/netflix in the browser too.

I fucking love copyparty. It starts simple enough but then the millions of options and configs let you twist it into exactly what you need.

As someone that runs a server OS that doesn’t support docker, it is very refreshing to see a single binary project. It has a focus on being administrator friendly thats really fallen out of fashion these days.

Yeah true the index headset wasn’t a bargain compared to the quests that were clearly being sold as cheaply as possible.

I think it would be fine. Friend of mine has Immich on a N100, like you mentioned, the initial ML tasks on a big library takes over 24 hours but once it’s done it doesn’t need much. I don’t have experience running next cloud but the others you mentioned don’t need much RAM/CPU.

ZFS doesn’t need much RAM, especially for a two disk 4TB mirror. It soaks up free RAM to use as a cache which makes people think it needs a lot. If the cache is tiny you just end up hitting the actual speed of the HDDs more often, which sounds within your expectations. I dare say you could get by with 8 GB, but 16GB would be plenty.

I’d only point out if you’re looking for it to last 10 years, a neat package like the ugreen might bite you. A more standard diy PC will have more replaceable parts. Would be bigger and more power hungry though.