Awesome! Thanks again :)

Thanks for keeping the site going! 🫡🫡

Like most other accounts in here.

/u/[email protected] don’t know if you guys still support the voyager instance, but updates have been broken for at least around a week and if go to the voyager.lemmynsfw.com url Cloudflare throws up a 526 and says your SSL certificate is invalid.

If you’re the owner of this website:

The SSL certificate presented by the server did not pass validation. This could indicate an expired SSL certificate or a certificate that does not include the requested domain name. Please contact your hosting provider to ensure that an up-to-date and valid SSL certificate issued by a Certificate Authority is configured for this domain name on the origin server.

Then educate us instead of boasting and being negative…

Sharing knowledge > sharing opinions

Other comments seems to suggest otherwise.

Who pays for Catbox?

Don’t be a fool, wrap your tool

Age verification is difficult and no amount of logins will prevent underage users from gaining access if they are actively seeking to.

«Shameless» copy of Apollo for Reddit.

Probably one of the best user experiences for any social media of any app.

I’m impressed at the speed of which they’ve copied it, but I really miss the Apollo account switcher where you’d long press your account name. In general the account switcher/manager in Apollo and it’s a bit sad they copied all of it.

Other than that great, and by permanent deblurring it made the user experience 10 times better for this lemmy.

You are arguing against a straw man.

Good luck with that.

Cool to know 🤘

Fully aware it’s unaffiliated, just that local settings was bad concept.

I definitely understand where you’re coming from, I was just attempting to debate cost/value.

I mean that’s not what I’m suggesting, but that’s kinda how the world works today.

Ideally you’d need a register of known hashes of material, but that’s not even enough either.

Proper fingerprinting would require a lot more processing power and a centralized source to vet against.

Super difficult topic tbh.

But I guess the moral is as always: don’t take pictures, or let anyone take pictures, that you don’t want to show to your parents or grandparents.

I mean since you brought up crypto I accept that as a given.

Just think that most people aren’t into crypto as much as those who are into crypto like to think.

Didn’t know GitHub sponsors was a thing.

Neat.

(Also: new sponsor).

If I can make one request (not that I feel you should be in any way honored to follow it up or prioritize it):

The local blur policy/implementation is horrible.

I want to just scroll through content. Everytime I log in I must update the settings.

http://wefwef.app doesn’t even give me an option to adjust it.

How big a proportion of potential supporters do you think would prefer to pay in crypto?

I’m in column A, but not column B. Just for “statistical purposes”.

This seems like a great start.

I’m sure you’ll find more corner cases as these rules start to be enforced.

I just hope you have the patience to see it through, although I’m sure some vocal people will get very up in your face about it.

IMO if you post something online you should be aware that it could (will) be copied and reposted.

Either by humans or bots made by humans to do just that.

Literally every time someone “views” a picture or video (or anything else you make available online) their device makes a local copy of it, and any proxy servers it passes through may even decide to copy it so it can be cached for later.

Apart from direct OC content most is older content being re-discovered, or new content from a studio.

Not a mod, but it seems fairly obvious that the interpretation of the rule must be that the content was made with consent, and posted online with consent. Not the re-hosting or re-linking in this instance.

And yes, the person in the content may later have a change of heart and contact the mods and say “please don’t keep this post of me up”.

I’ve seen lots of good content disappear this way, but it’s the subjects prerogative. There’s lots of creeps online that will do everything they can to make someone’s life a hell for posting adult content online.

The least we can do is be supportive when the subjects we objectify objects.

If we support people’s right to make adult content we must also support their right to withdraw that content to the extent possible.