The party of states’ rights and fiscal conservatism never was.

Caps is even more aggressive.

👏

Yum yum in my tum tum.

Technocracy = fascism

This is the intended use.

But I say paynit bertter.

Jennifer Aniston is an asshole boss.

“You are part of the rebel alliance and a traitor,” same guy.

As a person who watches a fair bit of the sport, I absolutely agree.

Horrifying.

Much less horrifying is the presumably AI written text in the article that I nearly had an aneurism reading:

The 1986 Chornobyl explosion – which happened when Ukraine was under Moscow’s rule as part of the Soviet Union – sent radiation across Europe. In the scramble to contain the meltdown, the Soviets built over the reactor a concrete “sarcophagus” with only a 30-year lifespan. The new confinement was built to contain radiation during the decades-long final removal of the sarcophagus, ruined reactor building underneath it and the melted-down nuclear fuel itself.

How are the concepts of ‘think for yourself’ and ‘respect people’s rights’ an absolute dichotomy?

Currently reading Sapling Cage and your words vibe with me now.

Just masculine?

This is a good thing and CNBC centers on the poor shareholders. Reduction of ewaste in this small area is positive.

Yeah he’s a racist prick. Pretty well known in the restaurant industry.

I’m more a “crop your screenshots for posts” dickhead.

The wax model of Dr. Evil

Hunting feral hogs is outdated management practice. It interferes with centralized operations that combat the feral hogs, but also educates the hog populations to be better at evading capture. Drop cages with baiting and cameras are the most effective management practice. Seconded by drones that use infrared to find sounders of hogs, those details are send to a helicopter with a sharpshooter to take out the whole sounder.

TL; DR: hunting feral hogs makes smart hogs and only makes thr problem of controlling and reducing population worse.

It isn’t wrong but that doesn’t make it a good word or the right word.

Technological speak isn’t colloquial every day language. Other industries simply aren’t taken to forcing industry terms into the general populace.

Use of the word agentic in everyday language is novel and marketing intentful.

Just because I say with peers that a leaf is cordate, sinistrose, and estipulate with a hirsute abaxial surface doesn’t mean anyone in science journalism will use those terms. They use colloquial language like the leaf is heart-shaped, spirally arranged, without a stem, and with small hairs on the underside because these terms make broad sense to the public.