These chatbots leverage a lot of emotions by having way too human interactions with people. In a sense, they are personified, which lead to vulnerable emotional people to have this sort of dependency and a massive fallout when it is unplugged or not accessible. Also, is no one going to point out an 8 year old saying she has a “boyfriend” and she has a dependency on ai?? Where dafuq are the parents?
Pigs are fun if they are raw? Guess that’s true, still I would prefer to have some bacon
Meeting rooms are there for a reason. And if there are not enough, good excuse to not go to the office
Had to double check if this was not a violet post
Using team status to know if you are working or not is both rudimentary and unreliable. There are a lot of times the status is just displayed wrong, besides, if stuff is getting done, then that is a sign you are working
There is a lot to be said when parents say shit like this. Other variations of this are “I had to deal with you when you were younger to be able to sleep”, or, “I gave everything I could to raise you!!” (Usually this one is after you disappoint them).
I am a parent now (very recently but still), and I can already tell my parents were full of shit when they said stuff like this. Listen up fuckers, if you have kid(s), it is YOUR job to give them the best chances in life by default. You do anything less because you don’t feel like it (and we are not talking about life difficulties and circumstances, which is a whole different thing), it is YOUR fault. Is that simple
That sounds like purgatory
You may be correct but I’ve seen this work out before. You say you take x days, manager mentions " but that guy says he takes y days!!" in which makes you either slow in comparison or the other guy is a liar or makes stuff sloppy. Then you say " from my experience is x days" in which either the manager says you’re wrong or he goes to the other guy to do in y days, and when you look at the thing done in y days has a technical debt equivalent to the height of Niagara falls. And you know you will have to clean this later. At some point I walked away, sometimes managers just want a yes man, and I am straight up not that.
On the left: when I arrive home from work. On the right: when I see my gf’s boobies after a long day.
Do not forget the VPN was rebadged from mullvad (I think) so it was not even their own stuff
… What do you mean you keep in contact with people if I have a phone? What a wild concept
This is actually an interesting answer. I am in the process of reading the main book as of now and I can already feel it won’t be enough. I did find out recently about rustlings and that is actually quite nice to have a feel on the language. I do think however more is needed, and as you mentioned, doing small programs should help. Problem is: where to even start? I find incredibly hard to have ideas on things to do on the smaller scale that are good for learning opportunities. Also another thing I am equating to do is to actually just read existing working code of some Foss project. I still didn’t find one that is good to already see patterns and other nuances, but if someone knows that would be very helpful.
I see a lot of people dog pilling on the down votes and getting all rilled up on someone that did try and unfortunately did not make things work. Why? Did is the sort of behavior that drove me away from linux many years ago (I am back with fedora and things work quite better since then). When you are ready to help out and/or be more understandable then things improve. Until then, you are creating moats with people you didn’t even met or understand.
deleted by creator
And that is also true, however, as a CEO you are paid for mostly 3 things:
If a CEO fails the accountability part… Why is he even being paid? I had a discussion over the years about managers that don’t take responsibility if someone on their team messed up and throw under the bus whoever did the thing wrong. If I was in a position of power, I am sure I would fire the manager on the spot. It is literally part of your function to take responsibility in a collective level
You are not wrong, but if you read between the lines it says the message exactly as I mentioned, claiming “they did it”, like the CEO has nothing to do with it
This story reminds me of something else I have been pointing out for a very long time. It is not so uncommon to see layoffs after McKinsey drops by the building for a while (could also be bein or other consultancies in the same field), and more often than not, ceos like to say " they made me do it!!". So… To be clear, you do not have agency and you are not control whatsoever about these layoffs? Really? Sounds difficult to believe.
If the only other would be my mom and no one else I would accept the “everyone thinks that you’re cute” part. Otherwise I would politely, but firmly, say to the people to go to the optician, because for sure they would wrong AF.
not enough minerals
On Lemmy there has been a lot of reaction against anything llms, no matter positive or negative for the technology. Granted, llms made everything worse, and the leaders of it won’t stop doom trolling. Which makes a lot of people averse to anything relates to llms, and worse, relate to ai = llms, which could not be further from the truth. Let’s see with time how it evolves, but right now is the direction taken is neither good or functional