It’s not just that, it’s also the fact they scored the responses based on user feedback, and users tend to give better feedback for more confident, even if wrong, responses.

NSAIDs cause crazy increased risk of intestinal bleeding and and it inhibits the ability for the kidneys to excrete uric acid, they also increase the risk of heart attack and stroke.

My point is that comparatively, acetaminophen is (or at least was) the safest drug for light pain.

I haven’t seen any new categories of painkiller that would indicate that’s no longer the case, though.

I’m confused where this zeitgeist about Tylenol being bad for you is coming from. I remember working in pharmacy that taking Acetaminophen was the least reactive painkiller with the least number of long-term issues, but I’m hearing a lot more people talking about how bad it is for you.

The studies I’ve seen have been correlative at best, and, considering that NSAIDs and opioid painkillers are far worse over time, I don’t understand the dissonance in advice that seems to be appearing.

Is this more “seed oil” nonsense?

Their predicted 2025 revenue is supposedly 5 billion so this is a decent chunk.

Not enough, but a decent chunk.

And then when those AI also have issues do we use the AI to check the AI for the AI?

I know we want to get really riled up and say that he’s committed a war crime but presidents have been extra judicially killing drug dealers since Obama put them on the Disposition matrix (the “kill list”).

Trump even goes out of his way to call them “narcoterrorists” because the way the law was written when the “war on terror” started (not that he pays that much attention to the law), anyone that has a mild supporting role in Al Qaeda and it’s diaspora have open season on them without Congressional oversight in perpetuity.

I want people to understand that this is wrong but also every president has been doing this since 2010

I imagine it’s a continuation of the isolation that social media causes.

edit: looked into this a little more and found This medium article. saying there wasn’t much change in the rate of sex weekly for adults in the 90s, and not until the early 2000s when OECD countries started seeing a reduction.

Not sure what to trust but Family Studies is a conservative think-tank so I don’t necessarily trust their data either.

If you’re putting in that much work, please submit those edits to musicbrainz! We need all the help we can get 😭

On a more positive note the newest IPCC report on climate has population decline being the biggest positive impact on climate change, so keep at it!

As a musicbrainz editor, don’t depend entirely on Picard and musicbrainz for correct tagging either cause shit isn’t as well curated as you think.

They’re also starting to charge more for the BIG ASS models.

The amount of times these things have to regenerate code to get it to work properly during the SOTA “agentic” operations, you can burn through your token allotment and get throttled super quickly.

The secret is a lot of beans actually taste great sweetened.

(Ex: There’s a food called zunda which is crushed and sweetened edamame)

You need to encode the metadata in a standard way, encode new data that shows up in a standard way, and various people can add more metadata to files: think like Posix ACLs or the immutable flag or whatever.

Nix actually invented a fork of tar specifically for this called “normalized archive” or “Nix Archive” or nar. Guix uses this too:

https://releases.nixos.org/nix/nix-2.22.0/manual/protocols/nix-archive.html

“here is a checksum of my /usr/lib folder, if yours differs from mine I can’t provide installation support”

I’m a big fan of them new fangled gravastars too.

rats, rats, we are the rats

I don’t agree with a total ban, but the writers of the article downplaying the harmful content on YouTube I think have forgotten the multiple times YouTube has gotten in trouble with advertisers for shit like “elsagate” where they were showing mutilation etc. of Disney characters targeted at children.

There needed to be some kind of regulation, but an outright ban is a bit much.

This feels like they’re trying to drive a tack with a sledgehammer.

I guess that means those cheap SoC boxes we’ve been seeing all over are gonna double in price.

Sure, but they just get replaced by a sycophant then it won’t make much of a difference