

Maybe they’re hoping for some texts regarding how cute their dog is
Maybe they’re hoping for some texts regarding how cute their dog is
I remember during Trump’s first term, where the Onion stated that they could not make up anything crazier than what he just does every day and therefore they would just do factual reporting on Trump
Fun fact, the velociraptor calls from Jurassic Park were based on sounds of turtles mating
Inspector Gadget theme song
A shame. Outlaws was actually really fun, both as a star wars game and in general (not as bloated with small minutae and repetitive tasks as some other Ubisoft games)
Ours can open all the way either left or right side, or a bit on top (opens inwards on all sides). The way it opens up top is nice to get some circulation going, and is also secure enough to be still covered by insurance in unlikely event someone would break in (appartment is on the first floor, but somewhat elevated. Bottom of the windows are about 2m from the ground).
We also have a mesh on the outsite of the frame to prevent insects from flying in regardless of which way they open.
I used autohotkey on an old work laptop at a previous job, as it didn’t have any media keys. Made ctrl+arrow keys into play/pause, skip, rewind, so that I could quickly pause spotify when calls came in
Cheeky
I’m in this picture, and I like it!
For the most part, MS does not need to do any lobbying in my experience. MS software and Office suite is generally the default for anyone who has not been particularly tech interested or worked in tech related fields.
Especially in terms of government/public type domains, almost everyone defaults to MS because it’s what they’ve always had, what everyone else has or they don’t know what alternatives there are.
The few to choose otherwise usually go for Google Suite, which in this particular case probably would have had the same result.
BREENTER
Not sure if I am surprised or not.
Cute! Very boopable
Iirc during his first period the Onion actually just wrote factual articles about Trump, stating that they could not make up content to compete with reality
Norway has also issued a travel warning for trans people going to the US
Unleash the Archers, many good ones but I really like the album Apex and especially Shadow Guide and The Matriarch
A Sound of Thunder, Queen of hell and A Sound of Thunder might be my favorites but many greats imo
As some have mentioned, the real answer is whatever works, as every relationship is different.
With that out of the way however I would generally reccomend three different alternatives, which will depend on what the goal/long term plan is.
Equal ownership of the appartment Your GF will either buy in with half of the sum already paid down or “take over” the remainder of thr mortgage that would equal owning half the appartment once paid down, and cover the corresponding portion of monthly down payments. Depending on their current savings this may or may not be feasible. If not able to pay upfront, it may be possible to calculate how much would be needed to eventuallly get to equal ownership and try to save up and pay bit by bit. Running expenses split 50/50
Partial ownership of the appartment Either split the mortgage equally or however large a portion you GF is able to cover financially, and at the point of either movibg out or selling calculate the what share of ownership those dowbpayments have equated. Depending on how long you intend to live their before selling or how willing you both are to commit at the current stage of relationship, this might be the best/fairest way to start of. Can easily transition into option 1 down the line. Running expenses split 50/50
No ownership share of the apparment. You keep paying all mortgage fees and you just split all other running expenses 50/50. If you at some point sell the appartment to buy a new one/a house together you could solve the potential inequality in funds by you coverkng the bigger part of the upfront cost, while she covers a bigger part of the resulting mortgage so that it eventually equates to a 50/50 ownership.
Hope this helps :)
A romantic relationship implies some capability of feelings, which is obviously unacceptable in Nestle’s value statement of “profit, profit, misery, profit”