They are going to argue it’s not protected under the true threat doctrine.
They are going to argue it’s not protected under the true threat doctrine.
What are your notes?
The Supreme Court in historically (and I can only imagine the current court will be the worst so far) has never been able to count to 14 much less interperate it.
He is already arguing the NLRB is unconstitutional.
Originally the retohric to elect Nazis was to blame the disabled that were a drain on society as well as the communists and leftists that were ruining the country.
Most people were Nazis in Germany because it got them a job. A lot of it was economics.
Edit: I am not excusing why they were Nazis. Does not matter why they became a Nazi or why they supported who they did. A lot of “common/average” Nazis beliefs started with economic reasons albeit at most times flawed and twisted logic.
There are pride buttons that say Y’all means all.
You can use circumstantial evidence to know this guy is guilty. The classes he sold about pimping. Him fleeing to Romania because as he said it’s harder to get convicted of sex trafficking. The previous reports on him by other women.
Just used thanks
Math ain’t made up. Math is discovered.
That just means we can’t know everything about the system. Not that it is not true.
What you are doing is a red herring. I assume because you have no rebuttal.
Tbh, as an American, fuck off. The Nazi uniforms looked nice that does not mean I want to see more made.
What is your union? Cause I don’t believe you.
I guess you don’t read into it with any historical outlook. because historically slave contracts are what happened when we had no labor laws. They could do worst the no regulations has done terribly worse. And most issues with today are lack of regulations we let corporations do whatever they want.
Most the Californians moving to Texas are conservative from my experience
I like the bit. It brought a smile to my face. Keep it up.
Nazi leadership was not competent.