Justice for Ceres, the original former planet.

9 can lnever be the correct number of planets in the solar system.

How did the artist manage to imagine Sisyphus angry?

To catch people selling or sharing essays online, I’d assume.

Por que no los dos?

To support the imposed US educated and chosen dictator, Syngman Rhee,'s mass killings that directly lead to the war?

As parent, I suspect actually meant to be poo.

Daily Mail are the sort who think adopting the metric system let all the foreigners into Britain and led to the downfall of empire. Probably in that order.

Tadpoles are fish too, right?

And they even have gills.

“Fish” isn’t a real type of animal, it’s a term of convenience for similar looking/acting things that humans have lumped together.

Its taking that back to the medieval level of “whales are fish”… Which ignores that key difference of them breathing air and not having gills.

No red eye in photos!

Or acid. Everyone always forgets acid.

(and the rules always forget bases. I assume, not read them in an edition and a half.)

But there’s about enough housing for everyone too… Just that it’s of houses are sitting empty across Europe, North America, and China.

And lots of the food wasted in those places (minus China) is imported from places with less food security, such as Brazil, India, and Morocco.
So it’s almost like the energy use and infrastructure is already part of the problem and solving it would take less.

My point is that Malthusian was never correct, and the problems are ones of distribution. Not number of humans. (And Malthusian worries tend towards genocide naturally, that they’ve been shown consistently to be wrong should make them doubly suspect.)

It’s been much the same for every big technology that’s come along.

TV, radio, electricity, boats, all led to people using the technology of the age to interpret the world.

It’s not though, seeing that a very large proportion of the world’s population get by, and that about 1/3rd of all food produced for human consumption is wasted each year. (Checked the UN source it’s 19% of food that makes it to people, and 13% of food pre-end point in the supply chain).

And this is without starting to consider the energy inefficiency of feeding livestock to feed to humans.

Also an awful lot of the world gets by with much less than US or much of Western Europe does. There’s a long way between our surplus of food and food insecurity.

Do you think this info graphic is more or less worrying if it is numbers of living beings rather than biomass?

I’ve only been to Saskatoon in Canada, so assumed all Canadians did that…

This is the real rule. “No backsies” just improves the game play.

Libre (and ethnic cleansing of Palestine supporting Microsoft) Office does, too.

Somebody lied.

Yes, because rule by the bourgeois will always tend towards a more authoritarian level than Socialism.