That makes sense to me. Thanks for the explanation!
Does it really benefit the whole bulk of artists or only the biggest ones?
It’s always a good think imho (without further elaborating).
Wasn’t there just a case where they ruled that a homophobic bunch can refuse services to LGBTQI+ members? If so, this might fall under the same freedom of business. I however think it’s really sad (especially in the above described case).
Is it possible to commercialize lemmy?
Don’t threaten me with a good time.