“Wave after wave after wave after wave after wave after wave after wave …”

-Zapp Braningan

Limp.

No hate towards Norway though.

Låmp?

It’s all about LÄMP

That’s rather acceptable…

Didn’t Klingbeil say something like the talks where promising just earlier today?

I thought it would be Musk would be the first scapegoat. Öets see who’ll finish the race first

I love that the load on all of these is 0% :D

He isn’t doing shit to the government. He’s doing everything for the government, which is a republican administration. Everyone in that administration is accountable, including Musk. Everyone backing the administration is backing Trump and doge and Musk and their policies. These people will not change because they don’t see anything wrong in their doing. Force the hand of those who disagree silently to become loud to force changes, by making them accountable.

So the US security guarantee is that the EU, which is not involved in the negotiations, is providing security guarantees. So even if Ukraine excepts, the EU would also have to except or Ukraine has, as in previous negotiations made by the republican administration, nothing.

You are absolutely incapable of judging the complexity of the tasks at hand. a) Calculating a hash of every uploaded image, comparing it against a blocklist, and extending the blocklist as needed b) validating each each post to distinguish truth from lie, facts from imagination and on top of that judging whether the presentation opinion fits in a moral/ethical framework of which a computer has no concept of.

A computer is a machine that calculates stuff. It “emulates a brain” to appear smart. A brain is a biological machine that is good in pattern detection and expression, which emulates a computer to do math to appear smart.

If you think an automated system can do it because you can do it, please spend your apparent infinit resources and time in implementing it rather than wasting your valuable time online insulting others who actually do something.

First: you people? Who are “we”, are unable to identify such contents / opinions? Second: I’m not talking about people identifying content and filtering it, I am talking about automated systems. Do you think that they are filtering Nicole’s by looking at each and every picture?

I guess limitless time and energy would be needed to identify authoritarian bots because it’s much harder compared to identifying a person in an image. Should nothing be done because the larger problem can’t be solved at the current time?

You mean the curvature of middle earth, right? RIGHT?!

Musk is a symptom! Trump is the elected guy responsible for the actions of his “employee”. Get him out and fix the nation!

Truly a man ahead of his time.

My Chrystal ball says that Elon keeps realizing agenda 2025 until the resistance within their own ranks becomes unbearable. While Elon makes news Trump makes legislation to fuck over whoever he can. Only then, goat Elon gets scaped by savior Donald to appease Maga and everything is in shambles.

So you expect that an AI provides a morally framed view on current events that meet your morally framed point of view?

The answer provides a concise overview on the topic. It contains a legal definition and different positions on that matter. It does at not point imply. It’s not the job of AI (or news) to form an opinion, but to provide facts to allow consumers to form their own opinion. The issues isn’t AI in this case. It’s the inability of consumers to form opinions and their expec that others can provide a right or wrong opinion they can assimilation.

Nice tits, bro!

But that’s not the definition of the absolut value, I.e. “distance” in complex numbers. That would be sqrt((1+i)(1-i)) = sqrt(2) Also the triangle inequality is also defined in complex numbers. This meme is advanced 4-4*2=0 Works only if you’re doing it wrong.