Biden.

Likability advantage? Since when was he likable?

I don’t know why they bother, reading the verbatim transcript of what he said is more entertaining than any clickbait.

Twice the refresh rate means twice the frames, so I’m twice as productive.

Or at any rate, that’s what I’m telling my job to try to get them to buy me a high spec gaming monitor.

Is it though? My understanding is that a murder charge requires intent to cause harm. Causing death without intent would be manslaughter. If someone is out of their mind in a panic attack and tries to shut down the plane so he could get to the ground, it would hard to prove he intended harm to the other passengers. They probably weren’t even in his thoughts.

Not a lawyer though, my understanding could be flawed.

Honestly, he’s an idiot and he certainly won’t get my vote, but I can’t even be mad about him running. I’m just glad to see a ballot with more than two relevant people on it. Sick and tired of choosing between “dumbass with a D next to his name” and “more dangerous dumbass with an R next to his name”.

History books are secondary sources. Which are sufficient for the average person studying history. Perhaps even preferable, since they are written with historical context already supplied, although you do also get the inherent bias of the author.

But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a place for primary sources like Mein Kampf. Primary sources are the only thing that tells scholars what was happening in history at any given time, and history books can’t be written without scholars studying primary sources. So should Mein Kampf be required reading for middle schoolers? Of course not, no one is saying that. But it may absolutely be required for, say, a graduate level course in WWII history.

Blacklisting or stigmatizing a text serves no one except those that want others to remain ignorant.