Doing so would save two to three billion euros, she said.

I can think of no other effects to worry about! Stop asking her about other potential effects!

This is why companies want US citizens to believe that EU is a bureaucratic hellscape (I mean there’s also the forces that want to tell them it’s communist for the same reason I guess)

This is stuff they could’ve gotten from location-data, or if your wifi was on, as you drive through different peoples’ wifi connections (both seeing where you’ve been, and hooking the data from you into data of people in your area to form connections of what’s trending and what they can get you to think about)

I’m not saying they’re not mass-surveilling in the most efficient ways they can, but hot-mic while sounding frightening, is the least useful tool ever for their means, and as has already been mentioned in this thread, android auto locks out that permission now anyway, making this a bad focus in the sense that it is not over just cause they can’t get to your microphone.

That’s monitoring you and your closests’ other behavior, as well as monitoring then nudging you towards wanting certain things. The ad itself is the last nudge in that chain that tries to go “you wanted this, don’t you?” after all of the other thinking it’s making a case for your life being better with it.

That’s a nice rice even, what the hey, kinda makes me wanna fuck around in wms again

probably the judicial branch actually

schumer the secret (public?) accelerationist

blue contrasts the wall better, even with the auto-white-balance taken into account

Well, always felt that.

I’ve had that feeling over photos taken 2 days prior.

I can’t tell if it’s just some mild version of body-dysmorphia

So like, I understand that you are angry with the terms, but by age of AI I think the article just means to quick-translate what we all understand to be a technology that is currently spamming the internet. You’re free to e-mail them (or I see they have their own forum/commentsection) about how this is not real AI and that it just hijacked the term for marketing purposes and they should write more responsibly worded articles, but I think the article overall serves as a good cry for help while using language that shouldn’t even scare off an AI-bro.

This community is literally called Fuck_AI btw, I would assume we know it is the common vernacular and don’t have to call people grifters for using that shortcut. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

My parents had some of the ancient ubuntu (or ubuntu based?) distros that they let me play with, I myself tried Manjaro in 2017 for a month (very scuffed back then), and then full Arch Linux since March or Apr 2021

Haven’t bothered switching since, but if I did, I’m lightly curious on the NixOS hype. Why yes, I just installed Arch Linux for the archbtw, but also it feels like it just works for me at this point (yknow, till the next fuckup akin to the grub2 fiasco)

2 with 3’s handle,

2’s head is just weirdly always satisfying

but 2’s handle is a bit comical

This is the fucking issue.

It simply overwrites your nuance.

Keeping away from X is more of a health thing honestly,

I know at least for me, it leaves me worse off reading through posts on there even if I’ve tried to fight them

as a former cashier, fuck talking to people, the mind’s enough

honestly no, you’d hypothetically probably be better off putting something in your bag than risk being one of those times the machine asks a worker over to scan shit

yeah they just work to get their own Shariah-Law

Yeah but it’d benefit the administration at least, I’m not saying it’d benefit anyone else!

i realize my wording is a bit wonky, when i say “we’ll exempt any tariff that goes to it”, I meant the getting resources from elsewhere would be subsidized

also just lower the minimum wage to $2 :^)

Bernie and Warren were definitely contributers to making Biden move on minimum wage,

but everyone who actually remembers when the Democrats had the majority knows better than that

the democrats did not have the overwhelming majority (60) that can surpass a filibuster, and yeah, the big-tentism hurts to an extent with more conservative democrats, but the states they come from don’t have a lot of alternatives in terms of what type of politician is going to get voted.

Democrats have the power to stop Trump right now, which they’re failing to do

Trump is engaging in a lot of bypassing that the judicial branch should be taking care of, but the judicial branch is compromised. They could in theory prevent bills that require overwhelming majorities yes.

They can and should protest it, but a lot of it is on the judicial branch saying no and reversing demands by the executive branch