WHOOOOOO

More educated, you mean? Cuz to my knowledge only one of them works in science

Doing a socialism trough capitalism somehow?

I know people tend to copy some of the language around them. I did not expect tech ceo’s to be so far up their own *** that they’d push their ai slop enough to measurably affect language in society

I use centimeters, and meters. The us can go sit in a corner and contemplate their failure in feet and inches

Someone didn’t actually read the article, dang op. You can do better.

It’s not that the power plant depended on the weather, but rather that the river life depended on not being boiled alive. Just like a coal or gas power plant, water is needed for cooling, which means the waste heats ends up in a nearby river.

But unlike coal or gas, nuclear doesn’t also produce a tonne of carbon dioxide. And oddly enough, a coal power plant would be more radioactive than a nuclear plant.

Not the best example in the us, perhaps. But you get the idea

Yes and no. They’re still humans. They should be held accountable, but they should also have the privacy to live their lives.

It’s not a simple black and white situation. There’s more nuance here

I suppose, either way it makes harassment and more misbehaviour more easily available

It would make it easier for these people to be harassed, or worse. Privacy is important

I think it’s more akin to a “get guns ez pz” article. Even if most people can get them, a lot of people don’t because it’s a hassle. But to be fair, if it’s public information then heck, it was only a matter of time until there was a website making it ez pz.

That’s not this article’s fault. And some important context I managed to miss at first :/

The concern was the lack of knowledge that this was public. I noticed it’s in the article, I may have read over it

A. A gun is a tool as well, doesn’t mean you should make them public available

B. That makes a lot of sense. I’m not from around there, sorry for the misunderstanding

Is this not doxxing? Posted by a mod no less

Ye I expect so, I don’t like the way this author just doesn’t bother explaining her points. She just states that she disagrees and says they should be left to their own rules.

Which is probably fine, but that’s just lazy or she’s not mentioning the difference for another reason

She names Trump’s points explicitly, but doesn’t go beyond “the best practices of this and that institution”.

I can’t say they’re wrong, I expect a scientific institution to have some integrity to say the least. But either she’s too lazy to look them up, or she’s not quoting any for a different reason

If only there was some sort of governing organization that’s supposed to protect us from unfair labour practices and exploitation

Just going by this article I can’t quite tell whether either party has good intentions. Except for that the writer here does not

Roll you own “platinum standard” and see if he buys it :p

Part of this is also the demand. Especially in places like the us, a lot of food is wasted, or nearly spoiled before it gets to the customer, or just straight up processed into heckin’ fuel and plastic.

That’s not to say that it’s a bit odd that subsidies from the cold war are still in effect today, and that those subsidies are being used to lobby for more subsidies :/

It does make my 3d printer filament cheap tho, thank you American taxpayers!