On top of that, I would say that any investor willing to invest in this wants to be mislead, so unless they are investing someone else’s money, why should we care?

I tend to block meme communities

Which is why you are discussing here in the political meme community, right? Well, thanks for letting us know :D

what the fuck is so hard for most people to believe about the idea?

For me, it is a fact that such establishments are first and foremost matter of convenience, you go there because it is close to where you are at that moment and you expect to get fast food of dubious nutritional quality that is about the same (non)quality as in every other similar place. For fine dining worth prior research you go elsewhere than the McDonald’s.

You research reviews of McDonald where you are going to get burger? Really?

I am not going to watch 70 minutes movie, but according to brief skimming through the discussion it’s about business practice of the Microsoft from times of windows 3.11

I am talking about his today’s undeniable philantropic work and the fact is he is really far from the rest of the people on your list.

People are allowed to evolve and if every billionaire in the world would evolve I’m the same direction he did, world would be better place.

I could name 6 people by memory just by using the parameters "Rich asshole who would have no empathy for the general pub

You should find more about gates than the name

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%26_Melinda_Gates_Foundation

The arrest

I don’t think that McDonald’s gives single fuck about review bombing

Except, that’s in the real world of physics. In this (…) scenario, x is infinite.

oh boy, no. if anything, it would be the other way around. in real world calculations, you can sometime approximate and still get reasonably precise result, or boundary, depending on your needs. not so in math.

hence the jokes like “for mathematician, pi as a pi. for physicist, pi is roughly 3,14, for civil engineer, pi is roughly 3.”

Thus the probability is 1.

it is not.

It doesn’t just approach infinite, it is infinite.

x is not infinite. x is a variable, that is to be substituted by specific number. infinity is not a number, it is a concept that express the fact that you explore how the function behaves when you are substituting bigger and bigger numbers. but none of these numbers are “infinity”. it is always specific number and the result never reaches the limit of the function. in this case, it is never 1, no matter how big number you substitute.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_of_a_function

sure. 100% means something will happen every single time in the observed set. if something does not happen every single time, then it is not 100%.

this will not happen every single time. among all possible results, there will be results where none of the monkeys start any kind of shakespeare. there will be instances where every single work they start will be just the paper full of letter “a”. or something else than shakespeare. as you add monkeys (approach the infinity) the smaller such chancegets, until it gets extremely unlikely, but it is not going to be zero.

imagine you are throwing a 6 sided dice hundred times and i ask you - is it possible there will be no 6 among those one hundred throws?

anyone who passed some basic math understand it is indeed unlikely, but it is not impossible. if you keep throwing long enough, there will be cases with zero 6s in it.

probability of that happening is (5/6)^100, which is 1,2 x 10^-8, eg it will happen roughly 1,2 times in ten million cases. not likely, but not impossible.

in 1000 dice throws, the chance drops to (5/6)^1000, roughly 6,6 x 10^(-80), or 6,6 in 100 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 cases.

fun fact: the above number (1 with 80 zeros) is called One Hundred Quinvigintillion (had to google that indeed).

if you further increase the number of throws in the series, the chance of not having single 6 will be getting even smaller, but never zero.

or in other word, if you raise 5/6 to any positive number, the resulting number is always positive number.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=%285%2F6%29%5En

for further study, the relevant concept here is limit of the function

we say that limit of the above function is zero, which means it will approach the zero really close (infinitely close), but will never reach it.

it is by formal definition 100%.

it is not

And y approaches 1 when x approaches infinity, then y = 1 when x = infinite.

you weren’t paying attention in your calculus.

y is never 1, because x is never infinite. if you could reach the infinity, it wouldn’t be infinity.

for any n within the function’s domain: abs(value of y in n minus limit of y) is number bigger than zero. that is the definition of the limit. brush up on your definitions 😆

No, not how it works

This is guaranteed with infinite monkeys.

no, it is not. the chance of it happening will be really close to 100%, not 100% though. there is still small chance that all of the apes will start writing collected philosophical work of donald trump 😂

FFS, it’s one monkey and infinite years.

it is definitely not that long. we already had a monkey generating works of shakespeare. its name was shakespeare and it did not take longer than ~60 million years

What an easy question to answer lmao

the problem is, unless you are dealing with really easy problem, the “easy” solution is usually the wrong one.

Okey, maybe I was unnecessarily confrontational. This whole thread is about transition, I have hard time imagining how my comment could have not been clear, but if I misread your intent, I apologize.

yeah, while complaining about something and not having a suggestion for alternative course of action is soooo revolutionary and world changing 😂

and you erroneously believe it’s self-evident what you meant

multiple people in this thread understood and didn’t seem to have a problem with it, except for you. so you are either troll, or not really equipped for a discussion anyway.

I was asking in good faith

of course you were. bye, sea-lion.

you are seriously getting bent out of shape to avoid answering. this thread is full of answers that are not very smart, but their edgy teenage authors all understood the question. if you don’t understand the question even after getting multiple hints, you don’t really look as smug as you think.

because you presented silly dichotomy in order to avoid answering my question.