• InputZero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Can’t believe I’m posting in a Palestine thread again but here we go. I think people aren’t using the same words in the same way in this thread. In the last decade there has been a shift in how the word liberal is used. Two decades ago there were the neo-liberals, which said they were not big C conservative but were.

    To separate themselves from the neo-liberals, liberals started calling themselves leftist. Which meant the neo-liberals as the only “liberals” remaining. So now the word liberal can mean a person on the left, or a person on the right, depending on the intent of the speaker.

    So saying that the liberals are turning a blind eye to genocide is true, the speaker probably just means neo-liberals but ommitted the neo. Language is fluid, and confusing

      • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        where people with conservative-minded views act like words were discovered in a fucking meteor crater

        Hahaha, I love that part. :D

    • geissi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It should be said that Neo-liberalism is an economic classification.
      It has little to do with social liberalism.

      • cobra89@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes it also doesn’t make a person “on the right” as this person is claiming (at least by American standards/definition), it makes them on the right side (almost the middle of the spectrum) of the left side of the spectrum.