• Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    Republicans already have full transcripts of the conversations and now want the audio so they can pull out of context for political purposes. But, they now canā€™t have them. Moving onā€¦

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The House Oversight and Judiciary committeesĀ are scheduledĀ to begin the process of holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with those subpoenasĀ on Thursday.

    The White House pointed out that the Department of Justice has already provided the transcripts of the special counselā€™s interviews with Biden and his ghostwriter, and has complied with the other aspects of the initial subpoena from Republicans.

    ā€œWith the information you now have, the Committees ought not proceed with contempt and should instead avoid unnecessary and unwarranted conflict,ā€ Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legislative Affairs, Carlos Uriarte wrote.

    Without the votes in their narrow majority or evidence of an impeachable offense, Republicans are now struggling with how to end their probe and are looking for ways toĀ target other members of the Biden administration.

    In their contempt reports, Republicans stated that the DOJ does not get to determine what information is useful to their investigation, andĀ arguedĀ that the verbal nuances of an audio recording provide unique insight into a subject that are not reflected in a transcript.

    Such pauses and inflections, Republicans claim, ā€œcan provide indications of a witnessā€™s ability to recall events, or whether the individual is intentionally giving evasive or nonresponsive testimony to investigators.ā€


    The original article contains 718 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 71%. Iā€™m a bot and Iā€™m open source!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    62
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    Soā€¦

    When Biden and the White House complained about the result of:

    Biden knowingly broke the law but is too old and confused to be prosecuted

    And they told us that was partisan bullshit and the interview tapes would show he has his shit together but they canā€™t release the tapesā€¦

    That was complete bullshit?

    This is the same shit trump would pull.

    • Tujio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      7 months ago

      No. They just know that Republicans and their cable news sycophants will do the exact thing they did with the Hur report.

      Ignore the overall findings, find one sentence in it that spins it negative, soundbite the fuck out of it, and repeat it ad nauseum.

      And yes, this is the same thing Trump did. And Obama. And Bush. This has been a standard move for decades. Itā€™s just news now because of the regressive morons in congress and their orange dictator-in-waiting.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        42
        Ā·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Republicans are going to say stupid shit anywaysā€¦

        Theyā€™re already saying it.

        The only reason to hide the tapes, is they make Biden look bad. If he had his shit together, theyā€™d be trying to release them to show people the report was biased.

        Candidate:

        This would exonate me!

        Everyone else:

        Can we see/hear it?

        Candidate:

        Objection! If people saw/heard this, it would make me look bad!

        This is a bad thing regardless of the letter next to a candidates name.

        Edit:

        Ignore the overall findings

        ā€¦

        Thatā€™s what youā€™re doingā€¦

        The overall findings was Biden knowingly committed crimes.

        find one sentence in it that spins it n

        Thatā€™s what youā€™re doing.

        You latched on ā€œcharges not recommendedā€ and are ignoring the rest of the sentence that says the only reason is because due to Bidenā€™s age and confusion, itā€™s unlikely heā€™d be found guilty as people would be sympathetic.

        Youā€™re not even focusing on a single sentenceā€¦

        • mrbean343@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          7 months ago

          ā€œThe only reason to hide the tapes, is they make Biden look bad. If he had his shit together, theyā€™d be trying to release them to show people the report was biased.ā€

          But they already released the transcripts. They are just refusing to release the audio. There isnā€™t new information to be gained. Just an opportunity for Republicans to splice and dice the audio for partisan purposes.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            32
            Ā·
            7 months ago

            It is, and itā€™s a god damn world saladā€¦

            https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/full-text-robert-hur-biden-classified-documents-interview-pdf-rcna142956

            At one point he talks about how NASA can cure cancer with protonsā€¦

            Americans donā€™t like to read, Iā€™m not sure how an American hasnā€™t noticed that.

            But all the shit we (rightfully) give trump shit about with his speaking ability and making up random shit is stuff Biden does too.

            A clip of him talking about how NASA has a cure for cancer is going to hurt him.

            And it does make sense he wouldnā€™t want that released.

            But be better than republicans. Hold your ā€œteamā€ to higher standards than just the letter by someoneā€™s name.

            • mrbean343@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              1
              Ā·
              7 months ago

              I donā€™t think Biden having dementia and spewing nonsense is news to anyone. Yes it hurts him and will draw more attention in audio than in text, which is one of the reasons they arenā€™t releasing it.

              ā€œBut be better than republicans. Hold your ā€œteamā€ to higher standards than just the letter by someoneā€™s name.ā€

              No. Fuck that. We tried that and ended up with a conservative majority on SCOTUS. Donā€™t do anything to give Republicans or Trump an advantage. Iā€™m just as disappointed as anyone that Biden is the best candidate the Dems can produce, and that his campaign slogan is effectively ā€œbetter than Trumpā€. But I donā€™t agree with making it easier for Republicans to hurt your campaign just for the sake of taking the moral high ground. Save that conversation for when your opponent isnā€™t a literal fascist. Make the Republicans work for it. If the transcript doesnā€™t titillate your Fox News braindead audience then too bad.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                28
                Ā·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                . Fuck that. We tried that and ended up with a conservative majority on SCOTUS

                ā€¦

                Refusing to fight for Obamaā€™s SC pick so that it could be used to get people to vote for a candidate disliked by most people from either party is not ā€œhaving standardsā€.

                Itā€™s wild to hear someone even suggest thatā€™s what happenedā€¦

                • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  Ā·
                  7 months ago

                  Refusing to fight for Obamaā€™s SC pick so that it could be used to get people to vote for a candidate disliked by most people from either party is not ā€œhaving standardsā€.

                  If this is what you think happened in 2016 after Senate Republicans openly admit that they blocked Obamaā€™s SC pick, then I hope nobody is listening to you because youā€™ve lost all credibility. They even said that they would do the same thing to a Republican president, but then they moved faster than Iā€™ve ever seen Congress move to install a new Justice just a few weeks before the 2020 election. Thereā€™s video of Lindsey Graham telling people to use his words against him if they behaved differently with roles reversed, and he behaved differently, and then that interview video went viral right before the election. Thereā€™s no excuse for not knowing what happened, so I have to assume that youā€™re just arguing in bad faith, trying to sow division.

        • czech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          Ā·
          7 months ago

          But the transcripts show that the ā€œdue to age and confusionā€ was a mischaracterization by Hur. Itā€™s like when Barr declared the Mueller report exonerated trump.

          There are a lot of podcasts that break it down if youā€™re not interested in looking at the transcripts yourself.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            27
            Ā·
            7 months ago

            There are a lot of podcasts that break it down if youā€™re not interested in looking at the transcripts yourself.

            Literally just posted it and Iā€™ve read itā€¦

            Most people arenā€™t politically active to be on a sub about it, theyā€™re not going to read it.

            Like, I run into this all the time, Biden supporters just donā€™t seem to understand how disengaged people are with Biden as president.

            If the I tervirw makes him look good like you claim, whatā€™s wrong with releasing it so people can hear the good bits?

            Why care if Republicans are going to talk shit if theyā€™re already talking shit and wonā€™t stop for any reason?

            The optics of Biden hiding it are worse

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              Ā·
              7 months ago

              If people are disengaged, there are no optics to hiding it because the only people who will even know already have their minds made up.

              Releasing it just gives Fox and their ilk material to chop and edit to make Biden look bad.

              Thereā€™s no upside to releasing it when the transcript is already out there.

            • Drusas@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              Ā·
              7 months ago

              If the I tervirw makes him look good like you claim, whatā€™s wrong with releasing it so people can hear the good bits?

              Because anybody with even a basic awareness of how Republicans operate knows that people wonā€™t hear the good bits. The statements will be chopped up and released as distorted propaganda pieces.

              They already have the transcript. There is nothing to be gained by giving them the audio. All it would do is allow them to further rile up their bases with disinformation.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                Ā·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Because anybody with even a basic awareness of how Republicans operate knows that people wonā€™t hear the good bits.

                Who cares?

                We arenā€™t going to flip Republican voters, heā€™s not gaining any he doesnā€™t already have.

                Elections are won and lost on dem turnout, and if the audio makes Biden seem capable, that makes the ā€œold and confusedā€ reason for not charging him bullshit.

                And that might be enough for them to also write off the reasoning for not charging him, and maybe even the fact that the report found him guilty

                They call Biden a fucking communist, no matter what happens, republicans will always tell their voters itā€™s the worst thing ever.

                So who cares what theyā€™re going to say?

                If this gets more voters to the polls, itā€™s a win for Biden.

                • czech@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  Ā·
                  7 months ago

                  If we donā€™t care what republicans think then why do we care about meeting their demands to release the tape?

                  If elections are won and lost on dem turnout then why give republicans the opportunity to create misleading sound clips? Do you think more dems are likely to listen to the entire tape or just a few moments stitched together played on the radio?

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      Ā·
      7 months ago

      Abusing executive privilege to gain an upper hand in the election is exactly what trump would do.