• WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    So, you want to regulate the use of plastic via an indulgence tax. But instead of charging the corporation, you want to add an additional tax to every single individual transaction? Or do you want to tax the corporation once and have the cost of the product go up. The end result is the same, except one is more efficient.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The spot where you charge it really doesn’t matter much except to the accountants; it’ll always just be factored into the price of the product. There’s no real difference between the company increasing the price by ten cents or a ten cent tax being levied at the register.

      I really wouldn’t call it an indulgence tax though. There are plenty of uses for single-use plastics that aren’t sodas or indulgences.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That and an indulgence tax does not solve the problem. The intention is not to get more money from taxes, or to lower the pores access to normal goods, it’s decentivise its use. And by definition the amount you would have to tax to achieve this has to be so much that it destabilizes the market. Thats the point.