Your question whether rhetorical or not is presented as a bad faith question. And to answer your question…yes. Apple and for walled garden environment.
What are you doing? Like what’s your end goal here? Are you attempting to make a point? Are you trying to say something deep? You’re on fucking Lemmy arguing that apple good for walled garden and locked down systems…
Holy shit, it’s so easy to make people on this site mad by just responding to their comments. I’m literally just trying to make sense of your shit take.
Your question whether rhetorical or not is presented as a bad faith question. And to answer your question…yes. Apple and for walled garden environment.
deleted by creator
Legislation was needed to force them to change
Apple bad for walled garden environment, so when Apple eases the restrictions on their walled garden, voluntarily or involuntarily, they’re still bad?
What are you doing? Like what’s your end goal here? Are you attempting to make a point? Are you trying to say something deep? You’re on fucking Lemmy arguing that apple good for walled garden and locked down systems…
Holy shit, it’s so easy to make people on this site mad by just responding to their comments. I’m literally just trying to make sense of your shit take.
So it’s good faith to say that when Apple does something good that they are bad and it’s typical of them to be bad?
Nope. But if it takes legislation for them to change something for the better instead of offering it then yes.
Good thing that didn’t happen here, then?