• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Guys I just had a wild thought

    What if… SpaceX’s Starlink… is the spy satellite network?

    • chalk46@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      it’s kind of a no-brainer really
      can they? yes. would they? yes. so will they? probably.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Every single ISP in the world is collecting every little bit of useful data they can and providing it to local intelligence agencies. Even if not, it’s safe to assume they do. There’s no reason to believe anything less for starlink.

  • Turbo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    And in sure 150 launches in a year is not contributed in any way to global warming…

    Especially that startship… Right?

    The problem is all with us, and that salad dressing container we threw out instead of recycling …or those plastic bags . Right?

    How are we not taxing them more? This Is unnecessary and no wonder the planet is heating up.

    150 rocket launches must make a material difference!

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Probably not as much as we assume. Space related emissions are 1% of the aviation industry. Also, we just discovered ocean trawling and dredging is the equivalent to the entire aviation industry…

      There just is a lot that needs to be done before even worrying about space launch emissions.

    • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Less than you would expect, this looks like it’s a good, balanced synopsis if you’re interested however you’re not wrong about it being a problem, and pointing out the PR/gaslighting that surrounds the issue.

      Also it’s worth noting that SpaceX is using LOX-Kerosone because it’s “cheaper” than options which pollute much less (namely LH2-LOX) because the cost of the kerosene is “externalized” and you are correct that something like appropriate taxing could start to fix that issue and force them to make better decisions…