Tonight, I want to announce that I will be returning to the arena of politics and challenging Nick [LaLota] for the battle over #NY1,” Santos told Semafor in a statement. “I look forward to debating him on the issues and on his weak record as a Republican. The fight for our majority is imperative for the survival of the country.”

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, fuck that. Elected? No. That would affect a lot of people.

        I want the debate to be the other guy just enumerating all his crimes, over and over, on repeat.

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It feels like a mooch ago we had a man hiding in bushes, we’ve been so over saturated with meme quality politics that I feel we just don’t get the same level of value from it.

        But I would still get a chuckle out of Santos being fired and arrested again.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’d be hard to boot him a second time. Everyone knows he’s a liar and fraud so the voters can’t really claim ignorance this time around. If GOP voters go for them it’s just because Trump has trained them to love fraudsters.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Semafor is a really weird new site by the Buzzfeed guy who wants to “reinvent the news” by using AI curation and short articles with click bait headlines…

      They’ve only been around a year or two. But I’ve noticed them getting posted a lot of Lemmy recently so I looked into them. It’s almost always headlines like this where it’s really hard not to click

      They also have a “good relationship” with China.

      They dont seem to be doing anything shitty right now.

      But I feel it’s like how internet disrupters like Uber provide great service at a loss till people are used to them.

      Once they get views, it’s all structured for “the algorithm” to push people towards certain views. If it’s slow enough and starts out unbiased. People wouldn’t even notice. Especially if the AI curating part is on a user by user basis.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        It did seem like an odd format when I read it and was strangely neutral given the subject. I don’t think I have read a single article about that dude where the author didn’t take some hard jabs at when he discovered cold fusion.

      • vegeta@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It gets good reviews on the sites I use to check for credibility and bias (MBFC, NewsGuard, Ad Fontes). Hopefully it can maintain this, but as it is new, will have to keep a more frequent eye on it.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s kind of my point.

          If it came out with propaganda everyone would write them off immediately.

          So “burn money” which in this case is no return in investment. Because if that’s whats going on, they’re there for propaganda, and not accomplishing it.

          Right now the primary goal would be getting people to use and accept them.

          Then the “AI curation” they brag about kicks in, and slowly but surely caters what someone reads to move them in the wanted direction.

          It’s not far fetched to think one day two people might get the same story written two different ways, with two different sets of pictures/videos.

          I dunno man, everything’s going to shit, when billionaires start talking about reinventing the news, being cynical feels like being reasonable.

          Journalism especially has went from people trying to report the new, to people trying to make as much money as possible, to people with more money then they can spend trying to change minds to control votes and laws.

          And it’s changed so fast, lots of voters still haven’t noticed.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      George Santos is my absolute favorite political figure.

      He is unapologetically the most hypocritical piece of shit and hilariously shady.

      He is the Andy Kaufman of politics.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    10 months ago

    Once upon a time I would have laughed and said he doesn’t have a chance in hell. But here we are with a guy convicted of business fraud, found responsible for rape, and who has 91 criminal indictments, on the way to a likely close presidential election.

    Crazy times.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a different district he’s going for. I’m not surprised he won Nassau county with how rightward people have been going here on Long Island (the land of the insanely selfish) but now he’s jumping to Suffolk county where he has a much better chance at winning as a Republican. The people out here are mislead enough to vote Republican, but I don’t think they’re stupid enough to vote for him over lalota.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fuck this piece of shit… Come out here to an “easy” Republican seat? He thinks it’s easy for him? I may not be able to convince my neighbors to vote Democrat, but I can definitely convince them not to vote for this steaming pile of lying shit.