psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.comexternal-linkmessage-square276fedilinkarrow-up1509arrow-down128cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1481arrow-down1external-linkApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square276fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoDon’t they cancel each other out?
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoUnfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoOne times one is still one
minus-squaretofubl@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoi times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoNo, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii. Two sexy, sexy dingii
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoNow the singular is “dingius?”
minus-squaredouble_oh_walter@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoHmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that. This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.
Don’t they cancel each other out?
Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
One times one is still one
i times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
That’s too complex for me.
No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii.
Two sexy, sexy dingii
Now the singular is “dingius?”
Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that.
This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.