psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.comexternal-linkmessage-square277fedilinkarrow-up1509arrow-down128cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1481arrow-down1external-linkApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square277fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoDon’t they cancel each other out?
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoUnfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 months agoOne times one is still one
minus-squaretofubl@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-211 months agoi times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-211 months agoNo, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii. Two sexy, sexy dingii
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·11 months agoNow the singular is “dingius?”
minus-squaredouble_oh_walter@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoHmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that. This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.
Don’t they cancel each other out?
Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
One times one is still one
i times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
That’s too complex for me.
No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii.
Two sexy, sexy dingii
Now the singular is “dingius?”
Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that.
This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.