cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/14097254

Smith’s execution by “nitrogen hypoxia” took around 22 minutes, according to media witnesses, who were led into a viewing room at the William C Holman correctional facility in Atmore shortly before 8 pm local time.

After the nitrogen gas began flowing, Smith convulsed on the gurney for several minutes. The state had previously said the nitrogen gas would cause Smith to lose consciousness in seconds and die within minutes, according to the Associated Press.

“I’ve been to four previous executions and I’ve never seen a condemned inmate thrash in the way that Kenneth Smith reacted to the nitrogen gas,” Lee Hedgepeth, a journalist who witnessed the execution, told the BBC’s Newsday programme.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    11 months ago

    It turns out there is discomfort involved when the mechanism for delivery doesn’t account for the CO2 being exhaled. Nitrogen isn’t the problem, but the way they did it was completely asinine.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      So what you’re saying is they didn’t scrub the CO2 that he expelled and so he basically rebreathed that, triggering the brainstem signal of hypercapnia?

      Wouldn’t this be resolved by having a tube with a slight negative pressure (like reverse cpap) linked to his nose for exhalation while the nitrogen was pumped via the mouth upon inhalation?

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s what I’m gathering from the articles. And yes, there are several ways it might’ve been done without causing suffering.

        The problem seems to be (based on all the articles I read leading up to this) that they were treating Nitrogen like a poison and they were afraid of all the ways Nitrogen might leak out, harming other folks such as the clergy attending him. It’s hard to tell whether that stupidity came from the journalists, lawyer, or prison officials.

        But basically you are right, there are ways this can be done far more humanely (if you absolutely must execute someone, which is an argument for another day), but this wasn’t it.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, they’re prison officials in Alabama. I wouldn’t expect them to do anything at all in a humane or intelligent way.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Oh shit. Yeah, that’s a real problem. And yeah, if that’s true that’s totally asinine; they eliminated the one obvious advantage that this method has over all others when it would have been trivial to make sure it was a non-issue.

      Maybe deliberately inflicting suffering was a design goal they just couldn’t let go of. 😥

      Edit: After looking over some of the reasons people are saying he was suffering, I don’t see much reason to think so or think CO2 was recirculating. I’m sure it was horrible knowing that he was going to die. I’m against the death penalty in general, and I think a lot of people are opposed to this just because it’s horrible to execute someone however you do it. But I’m pretty convinced that there’s no real reason to think he suffered physically while he was dying.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well that explains why he lived so long. He was living off the air HR started with in his lungs and as he slowly used the oxygen he started with he suffocated over 20 minutes

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do you have a source for this? I want to know more about it and I wasn’t able to find a place that was saying it.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Based on the manufacturer and the descriptions of the mask used, I believe this is the design: https://www.allegrosafety.com/product/half-mask-supplied-air-respirator/

        The fact that it took him over 20 minutes to die indicates something was done incorrectly. He held his breath, which certainly contributed to his discomfort, but that can’t account for 20 minutes. He had to have been rebreathing his own exhaled oxygen and/or the seal allowed for fresh oxygen to enter the mask.

        I’m not aware of the exactly design being publicly available so people are speculating based on what is known - primary that it was botched and he was in agony for 20 minutes, and working backward from there to figure out what they must’ve done wrong to create that outcome. But I’m still looking.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I amended my top-level comment to ask for more information and indicate some uncertainty, because I’ve been hearing conflicting things about the basic facts of the execution. Most news sources are saying he was dead by 15 minutes in. And you seem to have modified “convulsing” and generally struggling against his straps for some number of minutes, which at least a few minutes’ worth everyone’s in agreement about, into “in agony for 20 minutes,” which I have no idea how you would know that. Wouldn’t it be possible that he’s struggling because he’s going to die, not because he’s in pain?

          Can you send me a source or two on your complete picture of how it happened including the 22 minutes?

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            I sent you a source for 22 minutes. I also appear to have been mis-quoting “agonal breathing” when I said “in agony.” It was either an honest error or I read it that way in another article (which also might or might not have been misquoting agonal breathing).

            I’ll quote this section of that article:

            "Smith, who was on a gurney, appeared conscious for “several minutes into the execution,” and “shook and writhed” for about two minutes after that, media witnesses said in a joint report.

            That was followed by several minutes of deep breathing before his breath began slowing “until it was no longer perceptible for media witnesses,” the media witnesses said."

            Two minutes of shaking and writing is quite a bit different than what other articles were saying. It’s two minutes longer than I’d’ve expected for a painless death, but I’m not an expert.

            • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, that all lines up with what I thought. I’m sure it’s horrible knowing you’re going to die as it’s actually happening. But a few minutes of consciousness followed by convulsions and death, that sounds like what I’d expect from suffocating on nitrogen and I see no reason to think from that that in itself means it’s painful.

              The 22 minutes seems like it came from his “religious advisor” and doesn’t line up with what other people said. Also, there’s this:

              Speaking at a news conference on Friday, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said that 43 more death row inmates have elected to die by nitrogen hypoxia. People incarcerated on death row are able to chose their preferred method from electrocution, lethal injection or nitrogen hypoxia.

              • MagicShel@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m certainly not out to demonize it or present a false narrative, but it can be easy to get a bunch of things jumbled together when you’re trying to put it all together. I appreciate you pushing for facts and getting me to re-read a bit closer.

                • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I mean, I get it. I don’t think we should be killing people either. I think that’s the inherent horror that’s making people look for reasons why this is wrong. But I think they’re unintentionally opposing a method that’s less painful, with the possible result of continuing the torture that we currently put people through when they’re condemned to die.