• carbonprop@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What’s happening in the US isn’s even considered conservatism anymore. It’s the MAGA cult. I am definitely left, but conservatives don’t always need to be bad. It just so happens that the Republican Party has filled itself with people serving themselves and not the people who voted for them. Fingers crossed things go well this November.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Fascism is the natural result of unchecked conservatism. We are watching that natural progression play out now.

      We’ve let conservatism go unchecked for so long that I think it will take physical action to stop the fascist infection at this point.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think you’re conflating conservatism with capitalism. We have a corporatocracy that always takes precedent over the average voter. Worse on the right but enabled on the left. Ironically, as unpopular as Biden is, he is the most progressive president we’ve had in 50 years (and yes, before you downvote I acknowledge he is not even close to “being” progressive).

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I won’t downvote you at all. You make good points.

          However, I am not conflating conservatism with capitalism. The reason capitalism remains unchecked is because of conservatism (including neoliberalism). Conservatism is the tool of capitalism to remain unchecked.

          If we were to eliminate or marginalize conservatism (including neoliberalism), capitalism could be well-regulated by the representatives of the normal people rather than the representatives of the corporations.

          When I shit on conservatives, I’m shitting on so much more than their corporate knob-gobbling. I am also shitting on their racism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, antisemitism and other conservative traits. Conservatism is just fascism that has not yet matured to its final form.

          As for Biden, I much prefer this old neoliberal to any GOP conservative, and I despise neoliberalism. He gets a pass this time around. I admit he did way better than I expected his first term. And obviously the alternative next election is pure fascism, sooo… BIDEN 2024!

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Finally, someone I 100% agree with!

            I think I was confused by your use of the term conservatism. 99% of people will associate that completely with the right, when the reality is that there are plenty on the left also feeding conservatism which in turns promotes corporatism.

            Keep fighting the good fight!

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fascism is also the natural result of unchecked progressivism. Since what you mean by “fascist” is just “Authoritarian.”

        Clearly, as we’ve seen globally and historically, Authoritarianism is the rule rather than the exception whenever extreme right and left wing politics go unchecked. Internally, the left wing Soviets appeared pretty much identical to the right wing Nazis in function, since their attempt at implementing communism was just a state/party run economy.

        I’m so sick of this revisionist history “if we just keep going left nothing “fascist”/Authoritarian can ever happen” bullshit.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Fascism is also the natural result of unchecked progressivism.

          Can you give an example? You cited 1940’s Russia, but Soviet Marxist-Leninism was not progressivism. It was also not leftism, despite decades of conservative deception on this topic.

          Marxist–Leninists in the Soviet Union were famously opposed to “left communism” and social democracy. They openly opposed liberal democracy. They also supported an authoritarian style of government, which is definitionally opposite of progressivism.

          Here’s a link to a wikipedia page on the ideological foundation of the Soviet Union (Marxist-Leninism) to support my position that their government was neither “left” nor “progressive”. The points in my paragraph above are stated almost verbatim in this wikipedia entry.

          To use the Soviet Union as an example of a left or progressive government, you would first need to change the definitions of “left” or “progressive”.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            11 months ago

            Alright so clearly you’re going to just “no true scotsman” any and all examples that I could give, how about you show me the unrestricted left wing utopia that exists somewhere in the world? Or has no one ever attempted “true left wing” policies as you dictate them to be?

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You’ve got some nerve citing fallacies when you’re the one who started out with a massive strawman argument and a balance fallacy. First of all, no, the guy you replied to clearly did not mean “fascism” as a synonym for authoritarianism in general like you pretended he did; these days when we say it, we really do mean specifically that thing that matches Umberto Eco’s 14 points (or a similar definition). Second, no, there’s no unchecked left-wing authoritarianism going on here; you pulled that entirely out of your ass so you could make a bullshit “both sides” argument.

            • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Do you have any? I’d be really interested to learn more. I wouldn’t have thought progressivism unchecked would lead to fascism. Without balance I guess I don’t know what it would lead to.

              • rusticus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I would actually only think it would lead to fascism as an extreme reaction against progressivism, ala Weimar Republic.

            • rusticus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              There are plenty of countries in the EU that have favorable worker’s rights, free education and healthcare, and a healthy social safety net. Compared to the US at least.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              You can’t just go around calling yourself or others Scotsman when you’re actually from Antarctica and have never set foot in Scotland but like to put on an accent.

              What next the Nazis were socialists because they had socialism in their name? North Korea’s democratic because it’s in their name?

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                The Nazis had socialist in their name to sucker socialists into being useful idiots for them.

                You’d think socialists would learn from that. Socialists aren’t immune from getting suckered into a fascist movement. But unfortunately many “socialists” see a red flag with some yellow symbols on it and are all “sign me up!”

                In the end all ideology is just a scam to convince people to go along with a group without thinking too hard about it. Political thought for the intellectually lazy.

                Maybe we should think about each issue individually? That’s hard and I won’t have a political “home”! I’ll just go along with everything the whateverists say even if it doesn’t make sense. Yay I’m in a group!

        • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh, I’d love to know which extreme left wing politics have gone unchecked.

          I bet it’s “treating LGBTQ people as humans worthy of dignity.” That really seems to piss off conservatives.

        • Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          What would you describe as extreme left wing problems? I know there will be no response since you’re entirely full of shit.

          Edit : wow crickets what a surprise

    • JoeCoT@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      When was the last time there was a conservative president in the US who didn’t cause tremendous lasting damage to the country?

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Eisenhower(?) at the very least id say any damage he may have done was at least somewhat offset by good done. But he was still very much part of the new deal era so he is moreso the exception, besides him im pulling blanks both before and after.

      • Aatube@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        Depends on your definitions. You could even say Lincoln (conservative or not) caused lasting damage through failing to prevent a civil war and then getting assassinated before finishing the affairs

        • muse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Every time someone blames Lincoln for the Civil War, James Buchanan edges to completion in heaven

        • logicbomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Without looking up the answer, tell me approximately how long Lincoln was president before the Civil War started.

          • Aatube@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Like less than a year? (Looked it up, a month! huh) I’m not seriously accusing Lincoln of anything though, I’m saying that JoeCoT’s question doesn’t have much value.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah I know what you mean. I want to have debates over subjects that are actually debatable. Big government vs. small government kind of discussions.

      Instead I feel like we’re just struggling to constantly explain why burning down the Capitol and declaring Trump to be God Emperor is a bad idea.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree. They were always the worse option in my lifetime when looking in the generic but individually some were and option and was a good hedge against radical left things to help keep things centered. Again that being said the us has always been to right to me.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Conservatives are always bad.

      The past was not great for many peoples, today is still not great for many peoples, there is nothing to be gained from going back or staying still.

      • carbonprop@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        We’re having the same issue in Canada. Conservatives are wanting to go back and not look forward. It wasn’t always that way.