• Briongloid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The removal from the service thing is the most absurd part of these announcements, that was the benefit of VOD, that we could access what we wanted.

    Shows have gotten cancelled when they are popular and on a cliff-hanger throughout the last 60 years, but the removal thing is new and a massive decline from the accessibility improvements that were made over the last 15 years.

    Fortunately for me, my personal server doesn’t have this issue.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It also makes it impossible for a show to get later word of mouth bumps. Nobody sees it, new users don’t even know it exists, and so it has no metrics and no future whatsoever.

      • Briongloid@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s how Star Trek succeeded after The Original Series, but now there is no physical media comparable to streaming.

        You would think that the content would still be licensed by another streamer like Tubi etc, but then they have to factor their property only being available on a competitor.

        It’s never been a better time to selfhost.

    • interolivary@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t streaming platforms remove canceled shows so they don’t have to pay residuals to actors (or whoever is contractually getting them)? I’ve understood that streaming residuals are pretty shit to begin with

  • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Confirmed by Deadline, with some added details:

    The new season will complete post-production, and the studio will be looking for a new home for Star Trek: Prodigy as season one comes off the service shortly.

    The company said that “continues to be invested in growing the Star Trek franchise” with series including Star Trek: Starfleet Academy, movie event Star Trek: Section 31, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, which returned for its second season June 15 and has been renewed for a third season, animated series Star Trek: Lower Decks, which will return for its fourth season later this year and has also been renewed for a fifth season, the upcoming final season of Star Trek: Discovery as well as Star Trek: Picard.

    Update from series writer Aaron J. Waltke:

    Obviously, there is not much I can say. Everyone on the cast and crew loves #StarTrekProdigy deeply.

    I have noticed some misleading headlines, so all I can do is point to this particular part of the press release.

    We are completing season two on schedule and seeking a new home!

    Variety’s report contains this:

    According to an individual with knowledge of the situation, although the show had aired on Nickelodeon in addition to Paramount+, it will not be returning to Nickelodeon either. Those on the show will complete post-production on Season 2 and then CBS Studios will be free to shop it to other outlets.

  • snickerbockers@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    ugh, this destroys a lot of the appeal of Paramount+ for me. the only reason i have a subscription is that it’s the one-stop-shop for all things star trek, but i guess not anymore.

    They’re also really boosting the appeal of piracy (not that i would ever recommend somebody reading this post commit piracy) because that’s the only way to reliably enjoy the things you would otherwise be paying to rent.

  • triktrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ouch, that must hurt for Kate Mulgrew and the team.

    Why would Paramount remove the existing episodes from streaming service though? They have everything else Trek.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ah so it is just about residuals, I was just speculating on another comment that that might be the reason.

        This fucking sociopathic cutthroat capitalism where literally nothing matters except squeezing more money out of everyone is getting real damn old

    • Hypersapien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      They ended up removing it earlier than they planned because so many people were rushing to watch it before it was removed.

      • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I guess they were concerned about all the views reducing the value of the tax write-off.

        So, instead of SNW in the top of the Nielsen streaming numbers for this week (as they surely hoped), in a month from now we’ll see the figures for this week with Prodigy in the Nielsen top ten like 1923 and Picard.

        I wonder what investors and the IRS will make of that…

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I wonder what investors and the IRS will make of that…

          A whole big bag of nothing, it’s CBS. Investors on the other hand, dunno.

      • Shimmer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s actually a decent Trek show, and had Kate Mulgrew as Janeway for bonus points. Way better Trek than Discovery and Picard, at least.

        • exscape@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Including Picard season 3? 1+2 and 3 are so different that I think it’s almost unfair to even lump them together.
          (On IMDb, the worst-rated episodes of S3 are about tied with the best of S1+2.)

          • porthos@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            meh, I don’t trust IMDb ratings on trek, a certain section of angry star trek “fans” seem like they review bomb star trek shows pretty hard

      • flamingmongoose@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It absolutely is a kid’s show but once you get past the first few episodes and ESPECIALLY the second half of the season, it’s utterly Star Trek and pulls off a better season arc than any of the other modern Treks. ^Plus Janeway jokes about turning into a salamander.^

      • Newby@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I try to support the content I love. Not commenting on others actions but I do not sail the high seas. But I do think that modern content ownership is grey and we are going to be getting into issues where content is not available anywhere legally.

        • yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          modern content ownership is grey

          It’s worse than grey. It doesn’t exist unless you hold physical media in your hand.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Supporting content is noble and I do commend you for your intentions.

          Yet, I can’t shake the feeling that supporting streaming services is more of an encouragement for the companies to wave cool creations in front of you then immediately snatch it away again.

          • Newby@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You can support it by buying physical or digital copies as well.

            By the same token you can not support business practices. When my term is up I will cancel p+ and just buy the shows i want to watch instead.

    • shirro@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Had a kid that loved it and he generally refuses to watch any trek show. Cutting off that audience is going to cost them in the long run but I don’t think the owners of the IP have a long term vision

      • kethinov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Exactly, Prodigy was a surprise gem and is at the bottom of the list of current Star Trek shows that should’ve been canceled.

        • Discovery is an awful, manic, canon-wrecking mess and needs to go.
        • Strange New Worlds inherits most of that awfulness, is incredibly overrated, and also needs to go.
        • Picard was shaky but the final season finally delivered, thank the gods.
        • Lower Decks is well-written, nuanced, a good citizen of canon, and just wonderful.
        • Prodigy is well-written, nuanced, a good citizen of canon, and just wonderful.

        But the popular narrative is all over the place. People hate Discovery but love Strange New Worlds despite them being almost identical. People love Lower Decks and are tepid about Prodigy despite them having a very similar tone.

        At least most people seem to agree on Picard now.