Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 2 years agoWe live in the future!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square299fedilinkarrow-up11.84Karrow-down164
arrow-up11.77Karrow-down1imageWe live in the future!lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square299fedilink
minus-squarePatapon Enjoyer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up218arrow-down1·2 years agoPersonally I’m a fan of fake certificate that says you paid money for one of the plagiarism machine’s works
minus-square🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up52arrow-down4·2 years agoYou mean the Amazon rain forest destroyer machine?
minus-squarealekwithak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down43·edit-22 years agoHate this argument. No one ever discusses Fiat currency’s environmental impact. *Which includes literally, actually destroying the Amazon rainforest.
minus-squareevanuggetpi@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up43arrow-down2·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down20·2 years agoBitcoin does need to be proof of work. any system without that isn’t bitcoin.
minus-squareevanuggetpi@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·2 years agoethereum also has no supply cap. they are different technologies almost entirely. i would not call PoS bitcoin anything except p.o.s. there is still a pow blockchain running for ethereum, and there would be for bitcoin, too, and that is the blockchain i would call bitcoin.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agothat’s just like your opinion man
minus-squareAabbcc@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·2 years agoThey talk about it all the time and the impact is much, much less.
minus-squareEmerald (she/her)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down8·2 years agoAnd not all crypto is proof of work, some is proof of stake, which actually isn’t too bad environmentally
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up34arrow-down5·2 years agoNahh, NFTs deserve to be their own failure. Cryptobros get two fails for one tech.
minus-squarehavid_dume@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·2 years agoThat’s fair enough, but idk if anyone’s purchased an nft with anything but crypto.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down7·2 years agoThat doesn’t contradict the fact that crypto is fake money
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·2 years agoit’s not fake if people accept it.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoSo you’re saying it’s fake?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·2 years agono, because some people accept it
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 years agoYou should try reading comprehension, because not only did I NOT say crypto is real money, but I specifically said it’s a failure from the same tech.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·2 years agoDude. I didn’t claim you called crypto real money. I’m insinuating you misinterpreted the previous comment. Maybe cool down your projector.
Personally I’m a fan of fake certificate that says you paid money for one of the plagiarism machine’s works
You mean the Amazon rain forest destroyer machine?
Hate this argument. No one ever discusses Fiat currency’s environmental impact.
*Which includes literally, actually destroying the Amazon rainforest.
deleted by creator
Bitcoin does need to be proof of work. any system without that isn’t bitcoin.
deleted by creator
ethereum also has no supply cap. they are different technologies almost entirely.
i would not call PoS bitcoin anything except p.o.s.
there is still a pow blockchain running for ethereum, and there would be for bitcoin, too, and that is the blockchain i would call bitcoin.
deleted by creator
that’s just like your opinion man
They talk about it all the time and the impact is much, much less.
And not all crypto is proof of work, some is proof of stake, which actually isn’t too bad environmentally
* fake money
Nahh, NFTs deserve to be their own failure. Cryptobros get two fails for one tech.
That’s fair enough, but idk if anyone’s purchased an nft with anything but crypto.
That doesn’t contradict the fact that crypto is fake money
it’s not fake if people accept it.
So you’re saying it’s fake?
no, because some people accept it
Fair point
You should try reading comprehension, because not only did I NOT say crypto is real money, but I specifically said it’s a failure from the same tech.
Dude. I didn’t claim you called crypto real money. I’m insinuating you misinterpreted the previous comment. Maybe cool down your projector.
Do you mean Schrodinger’s artwork?